38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

HC Orders for blocking sexually explicit video of Judge with Staff [ Read Order ]

By LawStreet News Network      01 December, 2022 05:17 PM      0 Comments
HC Orders for blocking sexually explicit video of Judge with Staff

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has on Wednesday ordered all social media companies, messaging platforms and search engines to block and stop circulation of a "sexually explicit" video allegedly related to a Delhi's judicial officer and his staff.

Justice Yashwant Varma passed ad interim ex parte injunction on a suit filed by the woman concerned on urgent mentioning, in light of the imminent and irreparable harm that is likely to be caused to the plaintiff.

"Bearing in mind the sexually explicit nature of the contents of that video and taking into consideration the imminent, grave and irreparable harm that is likely to be caused to the privacy rights of the plaintiff an ad interim ex parte injunction is clearly warranted," the judge said.

The court also noted that the Full Court itself had taken cognizance of the incident on its administrative side.

Pursuant to the resolution passed on November 29, 2022, the Registrar General of the court has conveyed the need to take appropriate action for blocking of the said video over all ISPs, messaging platforms as also social media platforms.

The Registrar General has also in light of the directions issued by the competent authority requested the Union government to issue appropriate take-down orders.

"The defendants shall take all permissible steps to ensure that the further sharing, distribution, forwarding or posting of the offending video is restrained forthwith," the bench added.

The court directed Secretary, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology to take further steps warranted in terms of the order of the Registrar General.

The suit claimed an imminent and irreparable harm is likely to be caused to the plaintiff. It sought issuance of a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their associates, sister concerns, agents and others from publishing/re-publishing/telecasting, in any manner, a purported video of March 09, 2022 which is stated to be circulating on various social media platforms as well as web portals since November 29, 2022. Further, pleas were made for disabling the users of the services provided by the defendants from sharing or forwarding the video in question over their platforms.

"The court has had an occasion to view the content in respect of which the complaint is made. The court bears in mind the provisions of Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as 67A of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 which laws, prima facie,would appear to be violated in case further circulation, sharing and distribution of the video were to be permitted. The content, if circulated amongst parties and users of the services provided by the defendant Nos. 1 to 4, would also appear to, prima facie, violate the Legally Acceptable Terms of Use as adopted by the said defendants," the bench said.

The court issued notice to the Union government and other respondent parties and put the matter for further consideration on December 9.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email