38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

HC's order allowing ASI as party to Krishna Janmabhoomi case, correct: SC

By Jhanak Sharma      29 April, 2025 11:28 AM      0 Comments
HCs order allowing ASI as party to Krishna Janmabhoomi case correct SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that the Allahabad High Court's order allowing a plea filed by Hindu petitioners to amend their plaint to add Archaeological Survey of India as a party to the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, was correct.

Finding no error with the order, a bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar said that it is clear that the amendment to the original plaint by the Hindu plaintiffs has to be allowed.

The Muslim side, Committee of Management, Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah, Mathura, challenged the High Court's order.

In oral observations, the bench said that the plea by the Muslim side is absolutely wrong and the High Court should have allowed the amendment to add parties to the suit.

The bench said, prima facie, there was nothing wrong in allowing the amendment of the suit and replies to the amended plaint could be filed, and tagged the plea with other pending cases relating to the dispute.

The court, however, granted time to the Muslim side to file its written statement and deferred the hearing.

In March, this year, the High Court had allowed amendments to two suits and permitted petitioners to make the Centre's Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as respondents’. The mosque committee made “Devta Bhagwan Shri Krishna Lala Virajman next friend” and nine others including “Dev asthan Shri Krishna Janam Bhoomi” and Hari Shankar Jain as parties.

The mosque committee claimed that the High Court order permitting the amendment undermined its defense already on record and effectively allowed the plaintiffs to set up a new case.

The mosque committee contended that the amendment fundamentally altered the nature of the original suit filed by the Hindu litigants, who claimed rights over the site of Shahi Masjid Eidgah, alleging it to be the birthplace of Lord Shri Krishna.

The plea said over 15 suits from different plaintiffs are pending regarding the same property, raising overlapping and competing claims.

The plea said the High Court, while allowing the amendment, also allowed impleading ASI and MHA, without any formal application under the Civil Procedure Code, or establishing they were necessary parties to the suit.

On April 4, 2025, the court had issued notice on a separate plea of the mosque committee against the High Court consolidating all suits of the Hindu side in relation to the Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email