38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 19, 2024
Judiciary

Hearing of Controversial Sudarshan T.V. Show “Bindass Bol” Adjourned by the Supreme Court [READ ORDER]

By Lakshya Tewari      24 September, 2020 06:58 PM      0 Comments
Hearing of Controversial Sudarshan T.V. Show“Bindass Bol” Adjourned bythe Supreme Court [READ ORDER]

The apex court on Wednesday, September 23rd, 2020 adjourned the hearing of the controversial show of Sudarshan T.V. as the Central Government notified the court that a show-cause notice has been sent to the channel. Supreme Court set October 5th, 2020 as the next date for hearing in the matter. The Central Government requested the court to allow the channel to respond to the show-cause notice issued to them in order to explain the violations on their parts. 

Sudarshan T.V. was asked an explanation by the Central government with respect to the apparent violation of Section 20 sub-section (3) of the Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act, 1995 and the Uplinking and Downlinking Policy Guidelines of 2011. The explanation was asked by September 28th, 2020. 

Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta urged in the apex court that “My suggestions would be to defer this hearing to after 28 September… we can’t prejudge the government’s decision; the channel is also due to reply…and it is a detailed show-cause notice, displaying the facts which prima do not seem in conformity with the Program Code….we can’t pre-empt the government’s decision…”.

The bench lead by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising of Indu Malhotra, K.M Joseph said that “During the course of the hearing today, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India stated that the Central Government has, in the exercise of the power conferred upon it by sub-section (3) of Section 20 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulations) Act 1995, issued a notice to show cause dated 23 September 2020, to ‘Sudarshan News’. Since the notice is stated to be ‘returnable’ on 28 September 2020, the Solicitor General has requested the Court to defer the hearing in the present case so as to enable the Central Government to take a considered view of the matter.” 

The court ordered that “Since a notice to show cause has been issued by the Central Government to the fourth respondent today, the hearing of the present proceedings is deferred to 5 October 2020. The notice shall be dealt with in accordance with the law and the Central Government shall submit a report to this court indicating the outcome of the notice. Since the notice has been issued during the pendency of these proceedings, further steps in pursuance of the notice to show cause shall be subject to the result of the present proceeding and to such orders as may be passed by this court”. The court also said that the interim order passed by this court on September 15th, 2020 according to which the channel was not allowed to telecast the further episodes, shall continue to remain in operation. 

Before this the Central Government on September 9th, 2020 gave a green signal to Sudarshan T.V. to telecast “Bindass Bol” after the Delhi HC gave a red signal. The Central Government then said that Sudarshan T.V. is allowed to telecast the show but should keep in mind that it does not violate any of the program codes and if any violation is found, actions will be taken according to law.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
for-wrong-decision-of-suicide-by-person-of-frail-mentality-who-is-to-be-blamed-delhi-hc-gives-view
Trending Judiciary
For wrong decision of suicide by person of 'frail mentality', who is to be blamed? Delhi HC gives view [Read Judgment]

If a man of 'frail mentality' takes the wrong decision to commit suicide, who is to be blamed? Delhi High Court gives a prima facie opinion in the matter.

18 April, 2024 03:23 PM

TOP STORIES

lsj-exclusive-interview-how-bjp-govt-will-free-chhattisgarh-from-naxal-menace
Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
sc-rejects-review-of-order-to-pay-rs-154-cr-compensation-to-ex-air-force-staff-for-transfusion-of-hiv-infected-blood
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
cji-cautions-against-overlooking-ethical-legal-consideration-on-use-of-ai-in-court-adjudication
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM
need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email