38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 04, 2024
Judiciary

Hit-and-run case: SC Issues Directions to Address Lack of Compensation Claims [Read Order]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      15 January, 2024 04:34 PM      0 Comments
Hit-and-run case: SC Issues Directions to Address Lack of Compensation Claims [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has several directions to address issue of less number of claims made for compensation in hit and run cases, even though a scheme has been brought into force on April 1, 2022.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Pankaj Mithal said if the police conclude that it is a case of hit and run accident, they must inform the victim or his or her legal representatives about the availability of the Scheme.

"There are cases where the police, as well as the Claims Enquiry Officer, are aware of the fact that a hit and run accident has occurred.

However, no efforts are made to ensure that the persons entitled to seek compensation file their claims," the bench said.

The court noted that a Parliament reply stated that in the last five years, there were 660 deaths in hit and run cases, and there were 113 injury cases for which compensation of Rs 184.60 Lakhs was disbursed.

"If we compare the number of hit and run road accidents reported and the number of cases registered for seeking compensation, what stares at the face is that negligible number of victims have taken advantage of the said scheme. One reason may be that the victims were not made aware of the existence of the scheme," the bench said.

The court noted under Sub-section (2) of Section 161 of Motor Vehicles Act provides that in case of death of any person resulting from hit and run motor accident, a compensation of Rs two lakhs or such higher amount as may be prescribed by the central government should be paid. In case of grievous injury, the compensation amount is Rs 50 thousand.

"The value of money diminishes with time. We direct the central government to consider whether the compensation amounts can be gradually enhanced annually. The central government shall take an appropriate decision on this issue within eight weeks from today," the bench said.

The court also directed the central government to consider whether time limit can be extended as one time measure for making claims.

Going through records published by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways of the Government of India from 2016-2022 that there were 55,942 hit and run motor accidents in 2016, which increased to 65,186 in 2017, 69,621 in 2018, and 69,621 in 2019. In years 2020, 2021 and 2022, the figures were recorded as 52,448, 57,415 and 67,378 respectively.

The Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 provided for the setting up of the Standing Committee and District Level Committees. The Standing Committee is entrusted to make recommendations to the central government for the amendment of the Scheme for its better and more effective implementation.

"The Standing Committee must look into the causes of non-implementation of the Scheme and direct corrective measures to be taken to ensure that every claimant who is entitled to the benefit of the Scheme is encouraged to take benefit thereof. If the Scheme cannot be effectively implemented without making amendments, the Standing Committee must recommend amendments to the Scheme," the bench said.

The court directed the Standing Committee to make recommendations to the central government, if necessary for amendment of the scheme.

It should address the major concern that notwithstanding the availability of the scheme, very few eligible claimants are taking its benefit of the Scheme; the Standing Committee should issue elaborate directions for developing public awareness and for sensitisation of the members of the public about it, the court directed.

The court scheduled the matter, related to a plea filed by S Rajaseekaran, for further hearing on April 22, 2024.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

TRENDING NEWS

sc-stays-patna-hcs-bail-condition-requiring-victim-as-surety-orders-accuseds-release
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays Patna HC's Bail Condition Requiring Victim as Surety, Orders Accused's Release [Read Order]

The Supreme Court stayed Patna HC's bail condition requiring the victim as surety, ordering the release of the petitioner, languishing in jail despite bail.

03 July, 2024 11:19 AM
kerala-court-sentences-muhammad-h-to-101-years-in-jail-for-raping-his-own-minor-daughter-for-6-years
Trending Judiciary
Kerala Court sentences Muhammad H to 101 years in jail for raping his own minor daughter for 6 years

Kerala Court sentences Muhammed H. to 101 years of jail for raping his minor daughter; he used to tell her, “All fathers do this to their daughters”.

03 July, 2024 12:13 PM

TOP STORIES

president-murmu-addresses-joint-sitting-of-parliament-here-are-the-key-highlights
Trending Legislative Corner
President Murmu addresses Joint Sitting of Parliament; here are the key highlights

President Murmu's first joint session address highlights Modi government's third term, high voter turnout in J&K, GST milestones, and recalls the 1975 Emergency.

29 June, 2024 10:51 AM
sikkim-hc-allows-revision-petition-condones-delay-in-filing-criminal-appeal-emphasizes-justice-over-technicalities
Trending Judiciary
Sikkim HC allows revision petition, Condones delay in filing criminal appeal, Emphasizes justice over technicalities [Read Judgement]

Sikkim High Court allows criminal revision petition, condones 388-day delay in filing appeal, and emphasizes justice over technicalities.

29 June, 2024 12:36 PM
bombay-hc-dismisses-plea-against-hijab-ban-upholds-college-dress-code
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC dismisses plea against Hijab ban, Upholds college dress code [Read Judgement]

The Bombay HC dismisses a petition challenging a college's hijab ban, upholding the dress code as constitutional and not infringing on religious freedoms.

29 June, 2024 01:07 PM
lawyers-cannot-be-forced-to-abstain-from-work-amid-black-day-protest-calcutta-hc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Abstain from Work Amid 'Black Day' Protest: Calcutta HC [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court upholds lawyers' right to work amidst 'Black Day' protest, ruling Bar Council resolution non-binding.

29 June, 2024 05:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email