38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

If A Cheque Is Lost By The Bank, It Is The Responsibility Of The Bank To Compensate The Loss: NCDRC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      24 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
If A Cheque Is Lost By The Bank, It Is The Responsibility Of The Bank To Compensate The Loss: NCDRC [Read Order]

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) on July 19, 2019, in the case of Manager, Bank of Baroda & Anr. v. Chitrodiya Babuji Divanji has dismissed the revision petition filed by the bank after finding it guilty of having lost a customer's cheque.

The National Consumer Commission holding the bank liable ordered it to pay an amount, worth the cheque.

It was the bank's case that the cheque deposited by the respondent was dishonored and was sent to his registered address along with cheque return memo by registered post AD. The same was returned to the bank unserved, and thus there was no deficiency in its services.

The respondent, on the other hand, alleged that he persistently pleaded the bank to return his cheque. He even visited the bank personally to collect his cheque but, in vain.

The District Commission, vide its Order dated 10.10.2013, partly allowed the complaint. The State Commission, vide its order dated 20.01.2016, directed the bank to pay the full amount of the cheque, i.e., Rs. 3,60,000 to the respondent.

Aggrieved by the order, the present Revision petition was filed by the Bank under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

NCDRC found that while the dishonored cheque was returned unserved from the respondent's registered address, the same was not delivered to him on any later occasion. The respondent constantly pursued his case with the petitioner for return of dishonoured cheque and cheque return memo, however, the bank had lost the cheque due to which the respondent lost his right to file a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the account holder.

Taking into account that the respondent had to suffer a loss of Rs.3,60,000, the court upheld the order of the State Commission of Gujarat by ruling that When the cheque in question had been lost by the Petitioner Bank, it is the responsibility of the Bank to compensate the loss.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email