38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Imposes Costs And Dismisses The Plea Seeking Student Wellness Program For IIT Students In Light Of Rising Suicides

By Rhea Banerjee      27 September, 2020 04:07 PM      0 Comments
IIT Students Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday, 24th September,2020 had dismissed the plea seeking directions to the Centre and Indian Institute of Technology in the country to implement a student wellness program. The Bench comprised of Justice RF Nariman, Justice Navin Sinha, and Justice Indira Banerjee who called the plea a frivolous Public Interest Litigation and dismissed it. 

The Apex Court was of the opinion that the government was aware of the prevailing condition and dismissed the plea filed by Advocate Gaurav Bansal which asked for a student well program as the number of suicides by the IIT students was rising across the nation. 

The Bench was furious with the application and stated, This is an utterly frivolous petition. Tell us how much we should impose on you? We are dismissing the plea with Rs 10,000/- as cost payable to the legal services authority.

The Advocate mentioned that around 50 students had committed suicide in IIT in this half-decade and requested the Court to intervene in this matter and direct the Union Education Ministry and all the IITs to articulate and implement a Student Wellness Program, for their general wellness. He also referred that a committee has been formed by the Kanpur IIT specifically to look for matters related to suicide committed by students but there has been no improvement in the rate of increasing suicides among the students. 

The court stated regarding the directions from the Centre and told that the Centre is alive and aware of the current situation. 

The plea filed sought for a direction to 13 IITs to forthwith plan, design, formulate and effectively implement student health wellness program focusing on prevention and reduction of suicides within their Institutions as mentioned under Section 29 and Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. 

Section 29 of the Mental Healthcare Act defines Promotion of mental health and preventive programs

  1. The appropriate Government shall have a duty to plan, design, and implement programs for the promotion of mental health and prevention of mental illness in the country. Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in sub-section (1), the appropriate Government shall, in particular, plan, design, and implement public health programs to reduce suicides and attempted suicides in the country.

Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act talks about Presumption of severe stress in case of attempt to commit suicide

  1. Notwithstanding anything contained in section 309 of the Indian Penal Code any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed, unless proved otherwise, to have severe stress and shall not be tried and punished under the said Code.
  2. The appropriate Government shall have a duty to provide care, treatment, and rehabilitation to a person, having severe stress and who attempted to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of attempt to commit suicide.

In accordance with these sections the petition had sought and issuance from the Court directing the IITs to provide aid and support to their own students and help them to recover from the suicidal tendencies by calling on the helplines or call centers at their respective institute level. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email