38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 10, 2024
Judiciary

IT Rules 2023 Amendment: Bombay High Court urges Centre not to notify Fact Check Unit until Third Judge passes judgement

By Rintu Mariam Biju      07 February, 2024 03:48 PM      0 Comments
IT Rules 2023 Amendment Bombay High Court urges Centre not to notify Fact Check Unit until Third Judge

MUMBAI: On Wednesday, the Bombay High Court urged the Indian Union government to hold off on announcing its planned Fact Check Unit till a third judge has ruled on the case to the 2023 change to the IT Rules and rendered a decision. 

I am telling everyone here willing to listen that if I had the misfortune ever to be the 3rd reference judge, I would seriously be upset by the lack of courtesy in not giving me enough time to come fully to grips with a matter that has occupied this much time of a division bench. I am saying this only advisedly, Justice Gautam Patel reportedly said. 

Further, the judge added that it would be discourteous not to give the third judge the benefit of time to hear such a complex matter.

A week ago, the Bombay High Court delivered a split verdict in challenge against the validity of Rule 3(i)(II)(A) & (C) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology of the Central government may notify a fact-checking body that has the authority to recognize and label online news that it deems to be false or fake in relation to any Central government action, according to Rule 3. 

Justice Patel ruled in favour of the petitioners and struck down the provision. On the other hand, Justice Gokhale dismissed the petitions. Now, once theres a split verdict by a division bench, the case will be heard by a larger bench. In this case, a third judge will hear the case. 

Justice Patel ruled in favour of the petitioners and struck down the provision. On the other hand, Justice Gokhale dismissed the petitions.
When the matter was taken up today, senior Advocate Navroz Seervai argued that the SG's declaration would need to be made until the reference judge made a decision and a final ruling was issued. 

Tushar Mehta, the Solicitor General, strongly disagreed. He stated that the Rules might not be informed until the matter is assigned to a third judge, but not beyond that. He continued by saying that he voluntarily made the declaration to withhold notification of the Rules until the division bench's decision.

Senior Advocate Darius Khambata also made a similar appeal. May I appeal to Mr. Mehta, he had the wisdom and candour to make the original statement because he realises it's a complex issue...I only ask Mr. Mehta to reconsider if he wants to continue the statement.

That may harm the nation, was SGs reply.  Khambata, taking offense to this statement replied, I would rather not say that. Mr Mehta I would never make a suggestion that harms my country, I love my country, and that's not the way I make submissions. 

The SG reiterated that he would not make it since his declaration "not to notify the FCU" would be detrimental to the country.



Share this article:

About:

Rintu Mariam Biju graduated from the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi after comp...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release

The Bombay High Court on December 6, 2018, dismissed a petition filed against upcoming movie Kedarnath seeking a direction to stay the release of the movie

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order] Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order]

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband || "It is open for the court to decide the application filed by the husband under Section 25 of the 1955 Act, seeking monthly maintenance, by way of final proceedings, pending which, the application for interim maintenance filed under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, has been rightly entertained by the learned Judge and the husband has been held entitled to interim maintenance while the proceedings under Section 25 are pending," she noted.

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief || "There is something or the other going against every leader of the NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena... Prime Minister Narendra Modi has one thing in mind: he wants BJP rule from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, irrespective of the wishes of the people," Pawar said.

Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By  Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist

The magistrate court issues the process if it finds prima facie substance in the allegations made in the complaint. Once the process is issued, the accused persons have to appear before the court.

TRENDING NEWS

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM

TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-restoring-statehood-of-j-and-k
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for restoring statehood of J&K

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to restore statehood of Jammu and Kashmir as per the assurance given before it in the case titled as 'In re Article 370 of the Constitution', in a time bound manner within a period of two months.

09 October, 2024 03:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email