38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 19, 2024
Judiciary

J&K High Court to Resume Physical Hearings From February 8, 2021 [READ ORDER]

By ADITI AGGARWAL      09 February, 2021 11:42 AM      0 Comments
J&K High Court to Resume Physical Hearings From February 8, 2021 [READ ORDER]

After eight months, the Full Court of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has decided that physical hearing shall resume with effect from February 8, 2021. The HC has decided to resume physical hearing of cases in both High Court as well as Subordinate Courts and Tribunals in the Union Territory.

However, with a view to ensure that there is no complacency against the spread of COVID-19 infection, following protocols shall be observed:

1:  All latest SOPs of the Central and UT Government regarding gathering at public places shall be followed in letter and spirit.

2:  Advocates shall be allowed entry into the Court premises but it is to be taken care that only those advocates enter the Court building on a given day whose cases are listed on that day before any of the Bench/Court.

3:  On entry into the Court building, Advocates shall strictly maintain the social distancing SOPs while waiting for hearing of their cases. They shall not huddle either in the well or in the gallery outside the Court Rooms. As and when their cases are finished they shall make an endeavour to leave the court premises at once.

4:  Only such Advocates shall be allowed entry into a Court room as may be representing a party in a given case upto the maxinum of two Advocates for each party.

  • As and when a case is called/displayed on a Display Board fixed outside the Court room, the appearing Advocates may enter the Court room and shall maintain a distance of six feet between themselves.
  • In the gallery, outside the Court rooms, Advocates representing the parties in other two following cases according to serial number in the cause list shall wait for their turn, again maintaining the requisite distance.
  • As and when the Advocates finish their case in the Court room and exit it, they shall immediately leave the gallery and not stand there.

 

5:  Entry of Clerks and Agents of the Advocates into the Court rooms shall continue to be prohibited for the time being.

6:  Entry of litigants and public into the Court premises from the very outer gate shall continue to be prohibited.

  • If, however, any litigant on any reasonable ground is compelled to argue his case personally, he shall be allowed entry into the Court premises subject to the condition that he makes an application at least two days prior to the date of hearing through e-mail to the Registrar Judicial/Presiding Officer of the Court disclosing such compelling reasons and seeking permission in that regard.
  • If and when any such application is made by any litigant, the Registrar Judicial/Presiding Officer concerned shall consider the same and, if satisfied, may permit such litigant to enter into the Court premises and inform the litigant of such order by return e-mail.
  • A copy of such order shall also be sent by the Registrar Judicial/Presiding Officer concerned to the Incharge, Security at the main gate of the Court premises for necessary action.

 

7:  If in a given case one of the party appearing through Advocate insists for virtual hearing for any reason such as inability to appear physically, the Court may, if necessary, permit him/her to argue through virtual mode and the other party may present his/her case physically or the 1. matter may be adjourned with consent of the parties provided that advance notice for such virtual hearing is given to the concerned Bench Secretary at least a day before.

8:  Entry of the clerical staff of the Advocate General's office or of any Standing Counsel of any Department or any Government Officer shall continue to be prohibited in the Court rooms for the time being, unless specifically summoned or called by any Court.

9:  For the time being, Advocates are free to file their cases, applications 9. etc., either physically or by virtual mode.

10: The entry of Advocates in the office rooms/branches of the High Court 10. Registry/Courts shall continue to be prohibited.

11:  For the time being issuance of cause list of the High Court in hard/printed form shall continue to be suspended and shall be issued in the soft form and made available on the official website of the High Court.

12:  The aforesaid relaxation of entry into the court premisies shall only be i 09.30 am till 05.00 pm on each working day Cou 12 so as to enable the sanitizing teams assigned for the purpose to carry out sanitization of the premises according to the standing procedures in that behalf.

13:  The Registrars Judicial of the High Court/PDJs shall ensure that the latest SOPs and instructions on the subject issued by the Central and UT Governments and the protocol herein set by the lligh Court are strictly adhered to and in that behalf all necessary arrangements are made in the Court premises. In this regard, all the Advocates are requested to cooperate with the Registrars Judicial/Presiding Ofiicers or any 13 2 WWW.LIVELAW.IN Officer/staff, Security Force personnel posted at the entry points of the Court complexes/Court rooms entrusted with the task of implementing the aforesaid protocol.

14:  The canteens located in the premises of the Court Complexes are also permitted to be opened and run with effect from 08.02.2021 subject to the strict observance of all the relevant SOPs, instructions etc. referred to hereinabove.

However, the canteen holders shall restrict/reduce the attendance of their workmen to 50% of their respective roll of employees. They shall furnish the list of their employees and their daily work roster for maintaining 50% attendance to the respective Registrars Judicial/PDJ who shall provide an authenticated copy of such daily work roster to the Incharge Security at the main gate of the Court complex so as to enable them to identify these civilian employees and to allow them to enter into the Court premises.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
for-wrong-decision-of-suicide-by-person-of-frail-mentality-who-is-to-be-blamed-delhi-hc-gives-view
Trending Judiciary
For wrong decision of suicide by person of 'frail mentality', who is to be blamed? Delhi HC gives view [Read Judgment]

If a man of 'frail mentality' takes the wrong decision to commit suicide, who is to be blamed? Delhi High Court gives a prima facie opinion in the matter.

18 April, 2024 03:23 PM

TOP STORIES

lsj-exclusive-interview-how-bjp-govt-will-free-chhattisgarh-from-naxal-menace
Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
sc-rejects-review-of-order-to-pay-rs-154-cr-compensation-to-ex-air-force-staff-for-transfusion-of-hiv-infected-blood
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
cji-cautions-against-overlooking-ethical-legal-consideration-on-use-of-ai-in-court-adjudication
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM
need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email