38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Jammu And Kashmir HC Allows Two MPs To Meet Farooq Abdullah And Omar Abdullah, But Can't Brief Press [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      13 September, 2019 02:09 PM      0 Comments
Jammu And Kashmir HC Allows Two MPs To Meet Farooq Abdullah And Omar Abdullah, But Can't Brief Press [Read Order]

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court on September 11, 2019, in the case of Hasnain Masoodi and another v. State of J&K and others has allowed two Members of the Parliament (Lok Sabha), belonging to National Conference Party, to meet Dr Farooq Abdullah and Mr Omar Abdullah, President and Vice President of their party, respectively.

Justice Sanjeev Kumar has allowed the petition filed by MPs Justice (retd.) Hasnain Masoodi (Anantnag) and Akbar Lone (Baramulla) with the following conditions:-

That the petitioners shall ensure that their meeting with their party President and Vice President is restricted to a courtesy call and to know about the wellbeing of the aforesaid two persons;

That the petitioners, after meeting their party President and Vice President, shall not go to press/media regarding their meeting and deliberations with the aforesaid persons.

Petitioners alleged that their party's two top functionaries have been under house arrest since 5th August 2019 and have not been permitted to meet any party worker or even the relatives. They claimed that they, besides being members of the political party of J&K National Conference, are also close friends of above-named functionaries of the party and, therefore, are interested in their wellbeing.

In response, Mr D. C. Raina, the Advocate General submitted that there is no formal restriction put on the petitioners to meet their party President and Vice President. He also submitted that the State may not be averse to the meeting of petitioners with their President and Vice President, provided petitioners ensure that they would not do anything aimed at vitiating the peaceful atmosphere.

After hearing both the sides, the court disposed of the petition by stating that the "Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar, shall convey day, timing and duration of such meeting to the petitioners individually. It would be appropriate if the petitioners are permitted to meet the aforesaid persons separately on different occasions, either on the same day or on different days.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email