38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 22, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court of J&K Clarifies That Residents of J&K May Approach NHRC for Grievances on Violation of Human Rights as State Commission Was Wound Up [READ JUDGMENT]

By Dev Kumar Patel      24 December, 2020 08:52 PM      0 Comments
High Court of J&K Clarifies That Residents of J&K May Approach NHRC for Grievances on Violation of Human Rights as State Commission Was Wound Up [READ JUDGMENT]

The Srinagar bench of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has suggested that the residents of Jammu and Kashmir, if having any grievance regarding violation of their human rights, may have to approach the National Human Rights Commission. 

 

A public spirited person, Chairman of J&K Reconciliation Front and a Kashmiri Pandit in its petition submitted that there was blatant violation of the human rights in the fake encounter where three labourers, namely, Ibrar Ahmad, Mohammed Ibrar and lmtiaz Ahmad aged about 16, 21 and 26 years, respectively were killed on 18.07.2020 at Shopian. FIR was registered at Police Station, Hirpora, Shopian. It was termed as an encounter with the terrorists. However, was found to be fake. This was even admitted by the subsequent press release given by the Armed Forces.

The petitioner contended that the guidelines laid down therein by Honble the Supreme Court in exercise of powers under Section 142 of the Constitution of India are not being followed. The entire evidence will be destroyed, in case immediate action is not taken in the matter.

The petitioner further argued that after the promulgation of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019 (for short the Reorganization Act), the Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission ceased to exist and presently, there is no Human Rights Commission in the Union Territory of J&K, though Section 21 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (for short the 1993 Act) provides for constitution of Human Rights Commissions in every State and the Union Territory. In the absence of a Forum, the aggrieved parties are not able to get redressal of their grievances.

He further submitted that in terms of Section 30 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 Human Rights Courts are to be constituted at all places. 

The court on perusal of the petitioner prayers viz-a-viz the prayers made in the writ petition filed by the parents of the deceased, the court finds that both the prayers are same in terms of relief hence present petition in public interest cannot be entertained.

With regards to the Constitution of Human Rights Courts in the Union Territory of J&K is concerned, the court needlessly added that vide notification dated 07.02.2019 issued by the Department of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of J&K, the Court of the learned Principal Sessions Judge of each district has been designated as Human Rights Courts. 

With regards to the constitution of the State Human Rights Commission in Union Territory of J&K is concerned, a perusal of Section 21 of the 1993 Act provides for Constitution of a Human Rights Commission in the States. After enactment of the Reorganization Act, the Jammu and Kashmir ceases to be a State as now it is a Union Territory w.e.f. 31.10.2019.

The Court remarked that Prior to the enactment of the Reorganization Act, the Jammu & Kashmir Protection of Human Rights Act, 1997 was applicable in J&K. In exercise of powers conferred thereunder, the J&K State Human Rights Commission had also been constituted, which was wound up after the enactment of the Reorganization Act. The residents of J&K, if having any grievance regarding violation of their human rights, may have to approach the National Human Rights Commission.

 

[READ JUDGMENT]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM
madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM
can-courts-convict-an-accused-when-the-rape-victim-turns-hostile-supreme-court-says-no
Trending Judiciary
Can Courts Convict an Accused When the Rape Victim Turns Hostile? Supreme Court Says ‘No’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court acquits rape accused, holding courts cannot presume a victim was “won over” if she turns hostile; FIR alone cannot sustain conviction.

17 December, 2025 08:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email