38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Jayaraj-Bennix Deaths in Custody: Madras HC Takes Action Against 3 Police Officers Obstructing Investigation by the Magistrate

By Manthan Pandit      30 June, 2020 04:15 PM      0 Comments
Jayaraj-Bennix Deaths MadrasHC

On Monday, 29th June 2020, the Madras HC, Madurai Bench instituted suo moto contempt proceedings against three police officers for obstructing Judicial Magistrate's HC-ordered inquiry into the horrific custodial deaths of Jayaraj and Bennix in Tamil Nadu's Sathankulam city.

The action against the Court was based on the Judicial Magistrate's investigation, Kovilpatti against Thoothukudi ASP D Kumar, DSP C Prathapan, and Police Constable Mahajan.

A bench comprising Justices P N Prakash and B Pugalendhi observed "District Police administration are doing everything within their command to prevent the learned Magistrate from proceedings with the inquiry".

"The report shows that Mr. D Kumar, Additional Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin and Mr. C Prathapan, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin made themselves available in the Sathankulam police station and in their very presence, the other policemen were taking videos of the Magisterial proceedings. The policemen were not giving the records called for by the learned Magistrate and it is seen that one of them, viz, Mahajan, Police Constable, Sathankulam Police Station, had made a very disparaging remark in Tamil to the learned Magistrate", the bench observed.

The Court said the Magistrate's report was adequate to recognize Criminal Contempt under Section 15(1) read against the said officers under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

It may be noted that the Magistrate is conducting the inquiry as ordered by the High Court on 26th June 2020, in a suo moto case taken regarding the deaths of the custodian. 

The HC also noted that a free and fair investigation is not possible without the transfer of the said officers and the Sathankulam police station staff.

"We are of the view that unless the State Government intervenes immediately to transfer the Additional Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin and other policemen in Sathankulam, Police Station, it will be very difficult for a free and fair investigation and inquiry".

The next day at 10.30 am the appointed officers were asked to appear in person before the court.

 

Jeyaraj-Bennix Custodial Deaths: Questions About Lapses of Magistrate In Ordering Remand:

The matter concerns the father-son duo Jeyaraj and Bennix 's custodial deaths on June 22nd/23rd June 2020, after being arrested for allegedly keeping their shop open in breach of the guidelines for lockdown. 

The accounts they got of their horrific torture also caused a country-wide outcry at the police.

The HC also ordered the District Collector on Monday, 29th June 2020, to depute income officials to protect the case-related materials after the Magistrate alleged that the police had not cooperated.

This recent custodial death of the father and son who ran a cell-phone shop in Tuticorin has outraged public opinion and many celebrities have raised their voices against police violence.

The shockwaves created by the incident have transcended the borders of Tamil Nadu, unlike in several earlier incidents, and traveled across the country and outside, thanks mainly to a very descriptive video in English posted by Singer Suchitra. 

Just as they did for various causes earlier, such as the pro-Jallikattu agitation, the Save the Fishermen protest, and the Pollachi Rape Case, many Ktown celebrities have protested the death of the father-son duo, Jayaraj, and Bennicks Fenix. 

Upload Featured Image

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email