38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

JNU Sedition Case: Delhi Court Adjourns Case To Feb 28

By LawStreet News Network      06 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
JNU Sedition Case: Delhi Court Adjourns Case To Feb 28

The Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Deepak Sahrawat today i.e., February 6, 2019, adjourned the JNU sedition case to February 28, 2019, granting more time to the police to obtain the mandatory sanction from the concerned authorities to prosecute former JNU Student Union President Kanhaiya Kumar and others in the case.

The Delhi Police on January 14, 2018, submitted its chargesheet against Kanhaiya Kumar, students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya in the Patiala House Courts in a case pertaining to the alleged Anti-National sloganeering at the event in 2016 against hanging of parliament attack mastermind Afzal Guru.

The police charged the three accused for offences punishable under Sections 124A, 143, 147, 149, 120B and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Delhi Police claimed to have based its finding on the basis of documentary evidence, CCTV footage, and eye-witness accounts of approximately 90 persons.

Apart from the three then JNU students, the police have also mentioned 36 others in the chargesheet, without naming them as an accused due to lack of evidence.

When the matter last came up for hearing, the magistrate had refused to take cognizance of the chargesheet stating that the Delhi police filed it without sanction for prosecution.

According to Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the Indian Penal Code except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or of the State Government. Section 124A IPC (sedition) under which the accused persons have also been charge sheeted is placed under this chapter.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email