38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Judge must go by constitutional values in conduct and decisions: SC on appointment of Madras HC judge [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      11 February, 2023 07:12 PM      0 Comments
Judge must go by constitutional values in conduct and decisions: SC on appointment of Madras HC judge

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said a judge, who is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, must reflect and show independence, and adherence to the democratic and constitutional values by his or her conduct and decisions.

The top court also pointed out it is a fundamental duty of every citizen and more so of a judge to promote harmony, spirit of common brotherhood among all transcending religious, linguistic, regional or sectional diversities.

The apex court gave detailed reasons for not entertaining two pleas filed against appointment of L C Victoria Gowri as judge of the Madras High Court.

Among other reasons, it said the person in question has been elevated as an additional judge and "on taking oath the person pledges to work as a judge to uphold the Constitution and the laws".

On February 7, the court had dismissed the petitions filed by Anna Mathews and others, who claimed Gowri had rendered herself incapable due to her utterances, particularly against minorities.

On Friday, a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and B R Gavai said eligibility is an objective factor which is determined by applying the parameters or qualifications specified in Article 217(2) of the Constitution.

"Therefore, when eligibility is put in question, the question would fall within the scope of judicial review. However, the question whether a person is fit to be appointed as a judge essentially involves the aspect of suitability and stands excluded from the purview of judicial review," the bench said.

The bench also emphasised that after the Collegium of the High Court makes a recommendation for elevation of a person as a judge, inputs are received from the intelligence agencies, which conduct a background check, and comments from the government are considered by the Collegium of the Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice of India and two senior most Judges.

Further, opinion and comments of the Judges in this court conversant with the affairs of the High Court concerned are called for in writing and placed before the Collegium. Invariably a number of shoot down and dismissive letters and communications from all quarters are received. Only thereafter, and on consideration, the Collegium of the Supreme Court takes a final call, which is then communicated to the government, the bench said.

In its order, the court also said, "Not only is the conduct and judgements delivered considered at the time of confirmation, a judge is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, as the courts are open and the judges speak by giving reasons in writing for their decisions."

The court also said it goes without saying that the conduct of the judge and her/his decisions must reflect and show independence, adherence to the democratic and constitutional values.

"This is necessary as the judiciary holds the centre stage in protecting and strengthening democracy and upholding human rights and Rule of Law," the bench said.

The petitioners alleged Gowri made "hate speeches" against Christians and Muslims and was therefore unfit to the post.

The court, however, said exercising power of judicial review upon the Collegium decision would be contrary to the dictum of earlier decisions of the apex court, which are binding upon it.

"To do so would violate the law as declared, as it would amount to evaluating and substituting the decision of the Collegium, with individual or personal opinion on the suitability and merits of the person," the bench said.

The court also pointed out there have been cases where the persons recommended for elevation have expressed reservations or even criticised policies or actions, but this has not been held to be a ground to treat them as unsuitable.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

words-spreads-faster-than-winds-sc-relies-on-testimony-of-neighbour-acquits-woman-in-dowry-harassment-case
Trending Judiciary
'Words spreads faster than winds,' SC relies on testimony of neighbour; acquits woman in dowry harassment case [Read Judgment]

SC acquits woman in dowry case, citing neighbour’s testimony: “Word spreads faster than wind” — conviction under Section 498A set aside.

30 August, 2025 05:54 PM
sc-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-use-of-temples-land-funds-for-building-college-in-chennai
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to entertain plea against use of temples' land, funds for building college in Chennai

SC refuses plea against use of Chennai temples’ land, ₹25 cr funds for building college, says using temple assets for education not improper.

30 August, 2025 06:01 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM
18-former-judges-write-to-union-home-minister-amit-shah-criticizing-his-remarks-on-justice-b-sudershan-reddy
Trending Judiciary
18 Former Judges write to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy

18 ex-judges write to Union HM Amit Shah, criticizing his remarks on Justice B Sudershan Reddy, stressing judicial independence and dignity.

25 August, 2025 03:09 PM
sc-stays-investigation-into-firs-against-csds-co-director-sanjay-kumar
Trending Judiciary
SC stays investigation into FIRs against CSDS co director Sanjay Kumar

SC stays probe into FIRs against CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar over Maharashtra polling data post; says multiple cases show harassment motive.

25 August, 2025 03:14 PM
influencers-indulging-in-commercial-speech-cant-claim-fundamental-right-sc
Trending CelebStreet
Influencers indulging in commercial speech can't claim fundamental right: SC

SC: Influencers making commercial speech can’t claim fundamental rights; must apologize and act responsibly towards community sensitivities.

25 August, 2025 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email