38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Karnataka High Court orders police to release over 1.5 million vehicles seized for lockdown violations across the state

By Kartikey Garg      14 June, 2021 07:13 PM      0 Comments
Karnataka High Court orders police to release over 1.5 million vehicles seized for lockdown violations across the state

On Tuesday (June 8, 2021) the Karnataka High Court ordered the State Police to release over 1.5 lakh vehicles seized for violating lockdown rules. 

Instead of going to the magistrate, vehicle owners can now make an application to the jurisdictional police officers and ask for the vehicle to be returned in exchange for a deposit. 

On the state government's application, a division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Suraj Govindraj issued the following order. The State Government cited a Karnataka High Court order dated April 30, 2020, which allowed the Bengaluru police to release 35,000 vehicles seized for violating lockdown regulations. 

Courts Order

The Court began by noting that the state had seized 1,37,503 two-wheelers, 7,432 four-wheelers, and 7,123 other vehicles, and that it would be difficult for the police to find a suitable location for parking such a large number of vehicles. "Moreover, if the owners of the vehicles apply separately for vehicle return, the Courts of jurisdictional Magistrates will be overburdened," the court added.

The Court issued the following directions:

  1. Following verification of the applicants' ownership, jurisdictional Police Officers will have the option of releasing the seized vehicles to the owners by exercising the powers under Section 102 (3) of the Cr.P.C.
  2. The jurisdictional Police Officers can exercise this power if the owner of a goods vehicle (other than three and four-wheeler goods vehicles) is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- with the police, a four-wheeler owner is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- with the police, and a three-wheeler or two-wheeler owner is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.500/- with the police.
  3. These sums will be treated as deposits and can be used to pay a fine if the owners are ultimately fined.
  4. The vehicle's custody can be transferred to the owners if they sign a bond pursuant to Section 102(3) of the Cr.P.C., as well as an additional undertaking not to commit the same violations again.

Finally, the Court stated that if vehicles are seized by police officers in the future for similar violations to those listed in the order dated April 30, 2020, custody of the vehicles can be handed over to the owners on the same terms and conditions.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email