38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Karnataka HC hears PIL Challenging Cattle Slaughter Prevention Ordinance brought in by the Government of Karnataka [READ PETITION]

By Gautami Chakravarty      14 January, 2021 05:22 PM      0 Comments
Karnataka HC hears PIL Challenging Cattle Slaughter Prevention Ordinance brought in by the Government of Karnataka [READ PETITION]

The High Court of Karnataka on 12th January, 2020 heard a petition against a recent ordinance on prevention of cattle slaughter brought by the Government of Karnataka. 

The petition was filed by Mohammed Arif Jameel challenging the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Ordinance, 2020. The division bench consisted of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum who issued a notice while hearing the petition. 

The petitioners Advocate Rahamathulla Kothwal argued that a farmer who takes cattle to another village will be prosecuted under sub section 2 of section 12 and will be arrested under section 13. Therefore the offence is cognisable in nature. This will happen in the absence of rules being framed.

The Advocate general said that the state government is in the process of framing rules till January 18, 2020 which the bench allowed in the court of law. 

The Law violates the fundamental rights and it is unconstitutional according to the petition. Further it is said that Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees citizens to carry out trade and business, subject to reasonable restriction as mentioned in clause 6 of that Article. 

The petition claims that the new law is in violation of Right to Livelihood, under Article 21 of the Constitution. By imposing a ban on slaughter of animals for food the citizens with a choice to eat the flesh of such animals will be deprived of such food which is in violation of Article 21. The ordinance prevents them from consuming beef which is integral part of their culture and thus violates Article 29 of the Constitution.

Therefore, the petitioner sought interim relief and declaration of this ordinance on Karnataka prevention of cattle slaughter, 2020 as unconstitutional. 

 

[READ PETITION]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-rejects-plea-upholds-3500-aibe-exam-fee-by-bci-as-not-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

SC dismisses plea against Rs 3,500 AIBE fee, upholding Bar Council of India’s right to charge for exam expenses, ruling fee not unconstitutional.

03 September, 2025 11:16 AM
hc-dismisses-plea-for-bail-by-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-case-of-conspiracy-to-delhi-riots
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses plea for bail by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in case of conspiracy to Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC dismisses bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 riots conspiracy case, citing strong evidence and grave role in instigating violence.

03 September, 2025 12:20 PM
elgar-parishad-case-sc-defers-bail-plea-of-accused-lawyer-surendra-gadling-to-sep-17
Trending Judiciary
Elgar Parishad Case: SC Defers Bail Plea of Accused Lawyer Surendra Gadling to Sep 17

SC defers Surendra Gadling’s bail plea in Elgar Parishad case to Sep 17; advocate jailed over 6 years under UAPA charges without trial.

03 September, 2025 06:31 PM
unacceptable-sc-says-everyone-cant-come-to-it-just-due-to-physical-proximity
Trending Judiciary
'Unacceptable,' SC says everyone can't come to it just due to physical proximity

SC: Not acceptable to approach top court just due to proximity; raps Sukesh Chandrashekar’s wife Leena Paulose over bail plea hearing.

03 September, 2025 08:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email