38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, July 21, 2024

Karnataka HC Seeks Clarification from State on Delay in Investigations and Filing of Charge Sheet under SC/ST Act, 2015

By Meghna Mishra      18 September, 2020 08:34 PM      0 Comments
Karnataka HC Seeks Clarification from State on Delay in Investigations and Filing of Charge Sheet under SC/ST Act, 2015

A clarification has been sought by the Karnataka High Court from the State Government regarding the delay in investigation and charge sheet for the offences that were registered under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015.

The state government provided the requisite details to the HC. In the documents, it is stated that 35,091 cases have been filed under the Act of 2015. These cases have been filed during 2015-19. Out of the 35,091 cases, the charge sheets have filed for only 6541 cases.

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ashok S Kinagi presided over the matter. The division bench stated that Rule 7(2) provides that the charge sheet shall be filed within a period of 60 days. The state shall clarify whether the investigating officers have submitted any explanation for the delay in the investigation. The state government will have to take a call why there is a gross delay in filing charge sheets.

The court has suggested certain measures that can be adopted to administer the delay in investigation and acquittals. the court has opined that regular training courses for investigating officers and public prosecutors should be conducted by the State.

The Registrar General of the High Court is also called to submit a report on the proposal submitted for setting up additional special courts. The report should update the court on the status of such additional courts.

These directions by the HC have been given in the light of the PIL filed by the Committee for Monitoring and Strengthening SCs/STs in Karnataka. The petition sought directions for proper implementation of the Acts and Rules in the State.

The PIL further read, This is not adversarial litigation. Judicial notice will have to be taken of the fact that even several years after the Constitution is adopted and after the Atrocities Act came into force in the year 1989, there are several cases happening across the country of Atrocities within the meaning of Section 3 of the Atrocities act. Therefore, it is all the more necessary for the state to implement the provision of this Atrocities Act and said rules. Entire machinery for ensuring implementation in its true letter and spirit has been provided under the Act and said rules the only question is of activating the said machinery, for optimum results

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this


Trending Judiciary
Need to develop law, legal education in vernacular languages: CJI [Read Speech]

CJI D.Y. Chandrachud emphasizes the need for developing law and legal education in vernacular languages to make legal systems accessible to all citizens.

15 July, 2024 09:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
CIC has powers to set up benches: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court affirms CIC's authority to set up benches, emphasizing its autonomy for efficient case management under the RTI Act, overturning the 2010 Delhi HC order.

15 July, 2024 09:42 AM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
High Court halts investigation, orders Police to register crimes under new laws [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court stays investigation, directs police to use the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita instead of the old Indian Penal Code for registering crimes.

15 July, 2024 10:37 AM
Trending Judiciary
'This can't be done,' Madras HC observes on slaughtering goat with TN BJP chief on defeat in LS polls

Madras HC observes "This cannot be done" on PIL seeking action against DMK cadres for slaughtering a goat with TN BJP chief Annamalai's photo after LS poll defeat.

15 July, 2024 12:13 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email