38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Karnataka HC Seeks Clarification from State on Delay in Investigations and Filing of Charge Sheet under SC/ST Act, 2015

By Meghna Mishra      18 September, 2020 08:34 PM      0 Comments
Karnataka HC Seeks Clarification from State on Delay in Investigations and Filing of Charge Sheet under SC/ST Act, 2015

A clarification has been sought by the Karnataka High Court from the State Government regarding the delay in investigation and charge sheet for the offences that were registered under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015.

The state government provided the requisite details to the HC. In the documents, it is stated that 35,091 cases have been filed under the Act of 2015. These cases have been filed during 2015-19. Out of the 35,091 cases, the charge sheets have filed for only 6541 cases.

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ashok S Kinagi presided over the matter. The division bench stated that Rule 7(2) provides that the charge sheet shall be filed within a period of 60 days. The state shall clarify whether the investigating officers have submitted any explanation for the delay in the investigation. The state government will have to take a call why there is a gross delay in filing charge sheets.

The court has suggested certain measures that can be adopted to administer the delay in investigation and acquittals. the court has opined that regular training courses for investigating officers and public prosecutors should be conducted by the State.

The Registrar General of the High Court is also called to submit a report on the proposal submitted for setting up additional special courts. The report should update the court on the status of such additional courts.

These directions by the HC have been given in the light of the PIL filed by the Committee for Monitoring and Strengthening SCs/STs in Karnataka. The petition sought directions for proper implementation of the Acts and Rules in the State.

The PIL further read, This is not adversarial litigation. Judicial notice will have to be taken of the fact that even several years after the Constitution is adopted and after the Atrocities Act came into force in the year 1989, there are several cases happening across the country of Atrocities within the meaning of Section 3 of the Atrocities act. Therefore, it is all the more necessary for the state to implement the provision of this Atrocities Act and said rules. Entire machinery for ensuring implementation in its true letter and spirit has been provided under the Act and said rules the only question is of activating the said machinery, for optimum results



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email