38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 15, 2024

Karnataka High Court: Centre must publish draft notification in regional languages, or it will be stayed

By Prachi Misra      25 July, 2020 11:54 AM      0 Comments
KarnatakaHC draft notification regional languages

The Central Government stated that it will not publish the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification issued on 23rd March 2020 in the official language of the states. However, a plea was recently filed before the Karnataka HC demanding a stay on the said notification. 

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice M Nagaprasana heard the petition filed by a Trust United Conservation Movement said:

“Prima facie we do not agree with the submission that hands of the respondent are tied by virtue of provisions of the Official Languages Act and they cannot ensure publication of the notification in official’s languages of the state.”

During the hearing, Central Government Counsel Shiva Kumar submitted: “Notification is issued by the Ministry is as per official languages act. As per rule, it is published in Hindi and English in the official gazette. There is no provision which mandates our ministry to publish in vernacular languages. As per, Article 343(1) of the Constitution of India, the official language of the union, is Hindi, in Devanagari script. As far as the publication of the notification in official gazette is considered it is only in Hindi and English.”

To this the bench said, “If such hyper technical stand is being taken by the central government during the period of the pandemic, we will say that no further action shall be taken.”

Advocate Prince Isac appearing for the petitioner said the Central Government has taken a complete U-turn from what it said earlier before the court. He added that Environmental Protection Act, 1986 does not say that notification should be published in Hindi and English only.

To a query made by the court that whether earlier notifications were published in regional languages, Kumar said “Only in case of Coastal Regulation Zone, rules were published in nine coastal languages for the stakeholders to understand what will be the impact. But it was a pre-draft and not what was published in the official gazette.”

He added that ministry directed the State Environment Impact Assessment Authorities to translate the notification in local language. As regarding this extension of time was also given till 11th August.

In its order, the bench recorded “Instead of making amends, now a statement of objection is being filed by the Central Government contending that the Central Government is under no obligation to publish draft notification in official languages of the states. Placing reliance on the official languages act, the stand taken by Union of India is that publication only in Hindi and English language is valid and not required to publish in other languages. This stand is taken after making a solemn statement which is recorded in the order dated 16th July, that respondent has given direction to all state Environment impact Assessment Authorities to publish draft notifications in local languages. There is nothing placed on record that this direction issued has been implemented. On the other hand, time to file objections is extended only till 11th August.”

It further recorded that, “By exercising power under clause (a) of sub-clause (3) of Rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, the Government of India has decided to ensure that the notification is published in local languages in the states so that the citizens can file objections.”

The bench also said that “Prima facie, we are of the view that the respondent- Central Government must take immediate steps to ensure that wide publicity to the notification dated 23rd March, 2020 is given by publishing the same in official languages of all the states. If the publicity is to be given hereafter, hardly a few days’ time will be available to the citizens to submit objections. Therefore, the central government will have to consider extending the time for submitting objections.”

The bench again referred to the Environment (Protection) Rules and stated - “Ultimate object of the rules appears to be that those who are likely to be affected should be in a position to file their objection. We would have understand if the respondent would have extended the time to file objections, stating that due to the prevailing situation of pandemic the state Environment Impact Assessment Authority has not published the translation of impugned notification in regional languages of the state. The respondent ought to have come out with extension of time.”



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED; declines early date on plea by Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal against arrest

SC issues notice to ED, declines early hearing on Delhi CM Kejriwal's plea against arrest in liquor scam.

15 April, 2024 03:08 PM


Trending Judiciary
Location sharing of accused as bail condition: SC directs Google to explain how its PIN location-sharing work

Supreme Court directs Google to explain its PIN location-sharing feature as bail condition for accused, raising privacy concerns. Details sought on technical aspects.

09 April, 2024 02:06 PM
Trending Judiciary
'Can't jail everyone for making allegations against CM,' SC tells Tamil Nadu government

Supreme Court rebukes Tamil Nadu, saying not everyone making allegations against CM can be jailed; restores bail for YouTuber Sattai.

09 April, 2024 02:07 PM
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea challenging arrest by ED in liquor policy case

Delhi High Court dismisses Arvind Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by ED in liquor policy case, ruling it legal. Kejriwal remains in Tihar jail pending Supreme Court relief.

09 April, 2024 05:22 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC allows man to undergo potency test as wife claims marriage not consummated more than 7 years of alliance [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court permits potency test for husband in divorce case where wife alleges marriage unconsummated after 7+ years.

09 April, 2024 05:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email