38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 21, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kashmiri Pandits Group Moves Supreme Court; Call earlier dismissal orders unfair. Senior Adv Vikas Singh Comes Out In Full Support

By LawStreet News Network      26 March, 2022 04:50 PM      0 Comments
Kashmiri Pandits Group Moves Supreme Court Senior Advocate Vikas Singh

A curative petition moved the Supreme Court today by the organization called Roots in Kashmir. It is an organization that comprises of Kashmiri Pandits. The present petition has been filed as against the Supreme Courts order of 2017, through which a similar petition by the organization seeking probe was dismissed. The reason given by the Supreme Court for dismissing the request was long delay. The present petition is intended to seek probe into the killings of Kashmiri Pandits during the height of militancy in the valley during the 1990s. 

On July 24, 2017, a bench comprising the then Chief Justice JS Khehar and Justice DY Chandrachud had dismissed the petition saying "No evidence will be available after 27 years. What happened is heart wrenching but we can't pass orders now.  Subsequently, the review petition against the verdict was also dismissed on October 24, 2017. 

Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, President, Supreme Court Bar Association, Former Additional Solicitor General of India has come out strongly in the favour of the present curative petition filed by the Roots of Kashmir. It has been mentioned in the present petition that a denial to initiate probe merely on the basis of lapse of time, amounts to a "grave error apparent on the record".

Contentions Raised by the petitioner in the present Curative Petition: 

  1. To dismiss the plea for probe solely because there was a huge delay corroborates to bad law, as the delay had nothing to do with the victim families who were consistently fighting their battle to justice.
  2. There were some families who could not resort to pursuing the case due to genuine fear prevailing at that time.
  3. The petitioner pointed out that in the anti-Sikh riots case, the Courts have taken cognizance even after three decades.

"Because this Hon'ble Court has completely failed to appreciate that more than 700 Kashmiri Pandits were murdered during 1989 to 1998 and FIRs were lodged in more than 200 cases, but not even a single FIR has reached to the stage of filing of Charge sheet or conviction", the plea reads.

The curative petition also cited Delhi High Court's judgment in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case (Sajjan Kumar Vs CBI reported in 2018), where it was said, "It is important to assure those countless victims waiting patiently that despite the challenges, truth will prevail and justice will be done......" 

The petition had sought probe and prosecution of various persons, including leader Yasin Malik, for her massive contribution towards the mass killings that happened back then. 

The original plea of the Roots in Kashmir Organization had the following contentions:

  1. Investigation and prosecution of terrorists like Yasin Malik and Farooq Ahmed Daar @ Bitta Karate, Javed Nalka and others, for hundreds of FIR's of murders of Kashmiri Pandits during 1989- 90, 1997 and 1998, lying un adhered too even after 26 years
  2. Transfer of investigation of all the FIR's/cases of murder and other allied crimes against Kashmiri Pandits in year 1989-90, 1997 and 1998, to some other independent investigating agency like CBI or NIA or any other agency as appointed by this Court.
  3. Transfer of all the FIR's/cases pertaining to murders of Kashmiri Pandits, from State of J&K to some other State (preferably State of NCT of Delhi), so that the witnesses, who were reluctant to approach police or Courts in view of their safety concerns, can freely and fearlessly come and depose before Investigating agencies and Courts
  4. Completion of trial and prosecution of Yasin Malik for gruesome murder of 4 officers of Indian Air Force on the morning of 25th January 1990, which is currently pending before CBI Court.
  5. Appointment of some independent Committee or Commission to investigate into the mass- murders and genocide of Kashmiri Pandits during 1989-90 and subsequent years.
  6. Order investigation for the reasons of non-prosecution of FIR's of murders of Kashmiri Pandits and Court- monitored-investigation so that the hundreds of FIR's can reach their logical conclusion without any further delay.


Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-judicially-imposed-timelines-for-president-and-governors-on-bill-assent
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Judicially Imposed Timelines For President And Governors On Bill Assent

Supreme Court rules that courts cannot impose timelines or grant deemed assent for Bills, affirming flexibility under Articles 200 and 201 and reinforcing separation of powers.

20 November, 2025 12:43 PM

TOP STORIES

pakistan-transfers-sri-lankan-cricket-teams-security-to-army-after-islamabad-terror-attack
Trending News Updates
Pakistan Transfers Sri Lankan Cricket Team’s Security to Army After Islamabad Terror Attack

Pakistan deploys its Army to protect the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team after the Islamabad terror attack, ensuring top-level security for the ongoing tour.

15 November, 2025 11:52 AM
government-clears-45060-crore-export-support-package-with-new-legal-and-institutional-mechanisms
Trending Executive
Government Clears ₹45,060 Crore Export Support Package With New Legal and Institutional Mechanisms

India approves ₹45,060 crore export support package with new legal and digital mechanisms to boost MSMEs, streamline procedures, and strengthen export capacity.

15 November, 2025 01:35 PM
sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email