38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kashmiri Pandits Group Moves Supreme Court; Call earlier dismissal orders unfair. Senior Adv Vikas Singh Comes Out In Full Support

By LawStreet News Network      26 March, 2022 04:50 PM      0 Comments
Kashmiri Pandits Group Moves Supreme Court Senior Advocate Vikas Singh

A curative petition moved the Supreme Court today by the organization called Roots in Kashmir. It is an organization that comprises of Kashmiri Pandits. The present petition has been filed as against the Supreme Courts order of 2017, through which a similar petition by the organization seeking probe was dismissed. The reason given by the Supreme Court for dismissing the request was long delay. The present petition is intended to seek probe into the killings of Kashmiri Pandits during the height of militancy in the valley during the 1990s. 

On July 24, 2017, a bench comprising the then Chief Justice JS Khehar and Justice DY Chandrachud had dismissed the petition saying "No evidence will be available after 27 years. What happened is heart wrenching but we can't pass orders now.  Subsequently, the review petition against the verdict was also dismissed on October 24, 2017. 

Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, President, Supreme Court Bar Association, Former Additional Solicitor General of India has come out strongly in the favour of the present curative petition filed by the Roots of Kashmir. It has been mentioned in the present petition that a denial to initiate probe merely on the basis of lapse of time, amounts to a "grave error apparent on the record".

Contentions Raised by the petitioner in the present Curative Petition: 

  1. To dismiss the plea for probe solely because there was a huge delay corroborates to bad law, as the delay had nothing to do with the victim families who were consistently fighting their battle to justice.
  2. There were some families who could not resort to pursuing the case due to genuine fear prevailing at that time.
  3. The petitioner pointed out that in the anti-Sikh riots case, the Courts have taken cognizance even after three decades.

"Because this Hon'ble Court has completely failed to appreciate that more than 700 Kashmiri Pandits were murdered during 1989 to 1998 and FIRs were lodged in more than 200 cases, but not even a single FIR has reached to the stage of filing of Charge sheet or conviction", the plea reads.

The curative petition also cited Delhi High Court's judgment in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case (Sajjan Kumar Vs CBI reported in 2018), where it was said, "It is important to assure those countless victims waiting patiently that despite the challenges, truth will prevail and justice will be done......" 

The petition had sought probe and prosecution of various persons, including leader Yasin Malik, for her massive contribution towards the mass killings that happened back then. 

The original plea of the Roots in Kashmir Organization had the following contentions:

  1. Investigation and prosecution of terrorists like Yasin Malik and Farooq Ahmed Daar @ Bitta Karate, Javed Nalka and others, for hundreds of FIR's of murders of Kashmiri Pandits during 1989- 90, 1997 and 1998, lying un adhered too even after 26 years
  2. Transfer of investigation of all the FIR's/cases of murder and other allied crimes against Kashmiri Pandits in year 1989-90, 1997 and 1998, to some other independent investigating agency like CBI or NIA or any other agency as appointed by this Court.
  3. Transfer of all the FIR's/cases pertaining to murders of Kashmiri Pandits, from State of J&K to some other State (preferably State of NCT of Delhi), so that the witnesses, who were reluctant to approach police or Courts in view of their safety concerns, can freely and fearlessly come and depose before Investigating agencies and Courts
  4. Completion of trial and prosecution of Yasin Malik for gruesome murder of 4 officers of Indian Air Force on the morning of 25th January 1990, which is currently pending before CBI Court.
  5. Appointment of some independent Committee or Commission to investigate into the mass- murders and genocide of Kashmiri Pandits during 1989-90 and subsequent years.
  6. Order investigation for the reasons of non-prosecution of FIR's of murders of Kashmiri Pandits and Court- monitored-investigation so that the hundreds of FIR's can reach their logical conclusion without any further delay.


Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email