38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kerala HC Dismisses Quo Warranto Plea Challenging Appointment of its Former Judge as Chairman of Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes

By Pavitra Shetty      10 October, 2020 05:10 PM      0 Comments
Kerala HC Dismisses Quo Warranto Plea Challenging Appointment of its Former Judge as Chairman of Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes

In the presence of Chief Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Shaji P.Chaly, a writ petition filed seeking to issue the writ of quo warranto declaring retired Judge G. Sasidharan as disqualified to hold the post of Chairman of the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes has been dismissed

The petition was filed by S. Subramaniam, an activist and his arguments for disqualification of retired Judge G. Sasidharan as Chairman of the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes are based on the fact that he was appointed to the post of Upa Lok Ayukta under Section 3 of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, 1999.

The petitioner further contends that Judge G. Sasidharan is receiving salary and allowances from the State Government and thus under the employment of the Government and Section 3 (3) Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 provides for the removal of such persons. 

Petitioner referred to Section 3 of The Parliament (Prevention of the Disqualification) Act, 1959, which specified that an office of profit under the Government of India or any states shall act as a disqualification for the holder.

The most important question for consideration by the Court here was - Whether the office of Chairman of Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes is either under the employment of Government of India or under the Government of State?

The court made the following important observations which are as follows - 

  1. Merely because of Section 3 (3) Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 it cannot be said that the Government has control.
  2. Section 9 Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 states that advice of the commission shall ordinarily be binding upon the government. 
  3. Thus when the advice of the commission is binding on Government, the commission cannot be said to be under the control of the Government 
  4. Section 10 Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993 states that the commission shall have the powers of the Civil Court. 
  5. The Parliament (Prevention of the Disqualification) Act, 1959, is inappropriate for the case 

Lastly, the court rejected the contention that the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes is under the Employment of Government of India and thus dismissed the petition.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email