38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 21, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kerala HC Orders PFI To Pay Rs 5.2 Cr As Damages [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      30 September, 2022 03:56 PM      0 Comments
Kerala HC Orders PFI To Pay Rs 5.2 Cr As Damages

NEW DELHI: Days after country-wide crackdown, the Kerala High Court has directed the Popular Front of India, now proscribed, to deposit Rs 5.20 crore for damages caused of their "illegal acts" of calling flash hartal on September 23 in the state, saying citizens cannot be made to live in constant fear because they don't have might of such organisations and it is the rule of law and not the rule of mob which would govern the country.

A division bench of Justices A K Jayasankaran Namibiar and Mohammed Nias C P also ordered prosecution of PFI state general secretary Abdul Sattar, who had called for the flash hartal.

"We are of the firm view that the 12th and 13th respondents are wholly and directly responsible for the injuries inflicted on the members of our citizenry by their supporters, as also for the damage/destruction caused to public/private property by the said persons," the bench said.

The court also castigated the Kerala police for failing to contain the situation.

"It is of some concern that notwithstanding our declaration that the very calling of a flash hartal was an illegal and unconstitutional act, the State Administration did virtually nothing to prevent the hartal organisers from going ahead with their illegal demonstrations and incidental road blockages on 23.09.2022. The media reports also reveal that the police force played only a passive role in dealing with the situation," the bench added.

In strong observations, the High Court said, "Citizens of the State cannot be made to live in fear solely because they do not have the organised might of the persons or political parties at whose instance such violent acts are perpetrated. Our constitution guarantees to each individual in society certain fundamental rights, and the said rights are to be respected and guaranteed not only by the State as a governing body but also by fellow citizens who must view such respect for others rights as partof their fundamental duties under the constitution. It might be apposite to emphasise at this juncture that Article 51-A (e) in Part IV-A of our Constitution, obliges every citizen to promote harmony and spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities and to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women, while Article 51-A (i) obliges every citizen to safeguard public property and to abjure violence. A citizen of our country cannot therefore, either individually or collectively, ignore the above constitutional mandate. It is the rule of law, and not the rule of men or mobs that legitimises governance under our democratic Constitution."

In a stringent direction, the High Court also directed all courts that bail in hartal-related instances should only be granted after reparation amounts are deposited in those particular incidents.

It is to be noted that around 2,050 persons were arrested, and about 420 cases were registered in Kerala in connection with the strike.

The court also appointed claims commissioner P D Sarangadharan directed the state government to make it functional within three weeks to adjudicate damages or claims without delay.

Sattar had called for the hartal in protest against the arrest of PFI leaders in a nationwide operation of NIA on September 22.

The HC had Suo Motu registered the case in view of the strike call.

The HC directed PFI and Sattar to deposit Rs 5.20 crore to the state home secretary within two weeks. In case of failure, revenue recovery proceedings would be initiated against them.

The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation had informed the HC that it suffered losses worth Rs 5.02 crore due to trip cancellations and physical damages.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-judicially-imposed-timelines-for-president-and-governors-on-bill-assent
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Judicially Imposed Timelines For President And Governors On Bill Assent

Supreme Court rules that courts cannot impose timelines or grant deemed assent for Bills, affirming flexibility under Articles 200 and 201 and reinforcing separation of powers.

20 November, 2025 12:43 PM

TOP STORIES

pakistan-transfers-sri-lankan-cricket-teams-security-to-army-after-islamabad-terror-attack
Trending News Updates
Pakistan Transfers Sri Lankan Cricket Team’s Security to Army After Islamabad Terror Attack

Pakistan deploys its Army to protect the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team after the Islamabad terror attack, ensuring top-level security for the ongoing tour.

15 November, 2025 11:52 AM
government-clears-45060-crore-export-support-package-with-new-legal-and-institutional-mechanisms
Trending Executive
Government Clears ₹45,060 Crore Export Support Package With New Legal and Institutional Mechanisms

India approves ₹45,060 crore export support package with new legal and digital mechanisms to boost MSMEs, streamline procedures, and strengthen export capacity.

15 November, 2025 01:35 PM
sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email