38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kerala HC Orders PFI To Pay Rs 5.2 Cr As Damages [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      30 September, 2022 03:56 PM      0 Comments
Kerala HC Orders PFI To Pay Rs 5.2 Cr As Damages

NEW DELHI: Days after country-wide crackdown, the Kerala High Court has directed the Popular Front of India, now proscribed, to deposit Rs 5.20 crore for damages caused of their "illegal acts" of calling flash hartal on September 23 in the state, saying citizens cannot be made to live in constant fear because they don't have might of such organisations and it is the rule of law and not the rule of mob which would govern the country.

A division bench of Justices A K Jayasankaran Namibiar and Mohammed Nias C P also ordered prosecution of PFI state general secretary Abdul Sattar, who had called for the flash hartal.

"We are of the firm view that the 12th and 13th respondents are wholly and directly responsible for the injuries inflicted on the members of our citizenry by their supporters, as also for the damage/destruction caused to public/private property by the said persons," the bench said.

The court also castigated the Kerala police for failing to contain the situation.

"It is of some concern that notwithstanding our declaration that the very calling of a flash hartal was an illegal and unconstitutional act, the State Administration did virtually nothing to prevent the hartal organisers from going ahead with their illegal demonstrations and incidental road blockages on 23.09.2022. The media reports also reveal that the police force played only a passive role in dealing with the situation," the bench added.

In strong observations, the High Court said, "Citizens of the State cannot be made to live in fear solely because they do not have the organised might of the persons or political parties at whose instance such violent acts are perpetrated. Our constitution guarantees to each individual in society certain fundamental rights, and the said rights are to be respected and guaranteed not only by the State as a governing body but also by fellow citizens who must view such respect for others rights as partof their fundamental duties under the constitution. It might be apposite to emphasise at this juncture that Article 51-A (e) in Part IV-A of our Constitution, obliges every citizen to promote harmony and spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities and to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women, while Article 51-A (i) obliges every citizen to safeguard public property and to abjure violence. A citizen of our country cannot therefore, either individually or collectively, ignore the above constitutional mandate. It is the rule of law, and not the rule of men or mobs that legitimises governance under our democratic Constitution."

In a stringent direction, the High Court also directed all courts that bail in hartal-related instances should only be granted after reparation amounts are deposited in those particular incidents.

It is to be noted that around 2,050 persons were arrested, and about 420 cases were registered in Kerala in connection with the strike.

The court also appointed claims commissioner P D Sarangadharan directed the state government to make it functional within three weeks to adjudicate damages or claims without delay.

Sattar had called for the hartal in protest against the arrest of PFI leaders in a nationwide operation of NIA on September 22.

The HC had Suo Motu registered the case in view of the strike call.

The HC directed PFI and Sattar to deposit Rs 5.20 crore to the state home secretary within two weeks. In case of failure, revenue recovery proceedings would be initiated against them.

The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation had informed the HC that it suffered losses worth Rs 5.02 crore due to trip cancellations and physical damages.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email