38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

When Citizens are Pushed to Precipice, it is an Unexpendable Role of State to Control Profiteering by Anyone, Even Pvt. Hospitals": Kerala HC [READ ORDER]

By Nancy Goyal      01 May, 2021 09:37 PM      0 Comments
Kerala HC Role of State to Control Profiteering by Anyone

On Friday (April 30, 2021), the Kerala High Court announced that the state has an unexpandable role in controlling and containing the attempts of profiteer off the circumstances prevailing in the state. The Court also expressed that the state's parts in managing expenses require lawful and procedural challenges.

The matter was heard by a division bench of the Kerala high court comprising justice Devan Ramachandran and MR Anitha.

This petition was filed by Advocate Sabu Thomas demanding uniform Covid-19 treatment across all private hospitals, labs, diagnostic centers in the state. The Petitioner stated that in Kerala, private hospitals and testing centers are demanding high prices for diagnostic tests and treatment of covid 19.

The petitioner also stated government must take proper actions and remedial measures to control the exploitation by private hospitals in the treatment of covid 19 patients.

The petitioner further stated that, "It is the duty of the State Government that each citizen should be furnished with satisfactory treatment through Government Health Service or else assure the treatment through other private offices in the current fast spread of Covid-19 and inaccessibility of beds, ICU's and Oxygen supported beds and so on in the Government Hospitals.

Taking the note of plea, state Attorney SV Sohan stated in the court that the State Government had also given an order a year ago dated July 6, 2020, managing the 3 expenses of treatment in private hospitals. These specifications apply in full force even as on date.

To this end, the court observed that,

We, thusly suspend this matter to be approached on 04.05.2021, for the State to come with their ideas in this matter, adverting to the particular contention of the petitioner that the circumstance today is indeed definitely graver than in July 2020, when the above-mentioned Government Order had been given.

The court stated that This is not deja vu - what we are seeing today is explained by the specialists to be the 'second wave of the COVID19 pandemic.

It Court also stated that,

At the point when the pandemic previously hit us, a feeling of anamorphic confusion and brooding uncertainty happened to us. Normal and hardworking people were conflicted between the social and emotional fallout of distancing norms and lockdowns, on one hand, and by the horrifying heap of medical treatment costs on the other, which encouraged various States to bring out notices/orders covering and managing last year."

The matter will be heard next on 4 May 2021.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email