KOCHI: On Tuesday, the Kerala High Court stayed an order passed by a subordinate court summoning WhatsApp's India representative Krishna Mohan Choudhary to provide information regarding the first originator of certain messages in relation to a complaint filed by a lady politician.
The complaint was that the aforesaid messages outraged her modesty and tarnished her image as a politician.
Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas was prompted to grant a stay after accepting WhatsApps condition that since the offence alleged is punishable only with less than 5 years of imprisonment, Rule 4(2) [of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines & Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021] cant be invoked.
The Court was considering a plea moved by WhatsApp challenging an order of the Magistrate Court issued on November 20, 2023 under Rule 4(2) of the IT Rules 2021. In the plea, the messaging app also sought for striking down Rule 4(2) as unconstitutional.
As per Rule 4(2), a significant social media intermediary which provides messaging service must trace the identity of the first originator of a message, if a court order is passed to that effect.
It is WhatsApps case that Rule 4(2) violates fundamental rights to privacy and freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. Further, it is ultra vires the Information Technology Act, and manifestly arbitrary in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
It was further brought to light that challenge to the IT Rules is already pending before various High Courts.
Advocates Tejas Karia, Swati Agarwal, Shashank Mishra, Akshi Rastogi, Thomas P Kuruvilla and P Prijith appeared for WhatsApp.