38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Keventers No Longer As Good As It Used To Be Says Delhi HC Judge During Hearing

By LawStreet News Network      07 June, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Keventers No Longer As Good As It Used To Be Says Delhi HC Judge During Hearing

A Delhi High Court Judge while hearing a case involving Super Milk Products Pvt. Ltd, has recently remarked that the popular milkshake brand Keventers was "no longer as good as it used to be" before closing down in 1970.

Super Milk Products Pvt. Ltd, which in 2015 re-launched the Keventers brand of milk products was in the court against one of its licensees which was allegedly selling sub-standard milk products under the Keventers brand name.

During the hearing, Justice J.R. Midha told the lawyers for the company that Keventers was no longer as good as it used to be.

Justice Midha said: Your products are not at all fit for consumption, and added, you change your own product.

Responding to it, the companys lawyer said that the judge may have bought products sold by the allegedly defaulting licensee.

To this, Justice Midha said that he had the same experience at several outlets.

The company, in its plea, has accused its licensee Prime Interglobe Pvt. Ltd of selling allegedly products that were a health hazard without the approval of the food safety authority, FSSAI.

The allegations were denied by the licensee contending that it had made a substantial investment into its outlet.

Super Milks lawyers told the court that the company was not going to give its ingredients to the licensee and sought its directions to Prime Interglobe not to sell the milk products under the Keventers brand name.

On hearing both the parties, the court, however, declined to grant any interim injunction against the franchisee restraining it from selling milk products under the Keventers name and asked both the parties to instead go for mediation to resolve the dispute between them.

The court declined to pass any such order without completion of pleadings and listed the matter for further hearing on July 2, 2019.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email