38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kiren Rijiju Replaced by Arjun Ram Meghwal as Law Minister: A Surprise Cabinet Reshuffle

By Harshvardhan Sharma      18 May, 2023 11:54 PM      0 Comments
Kiren Rijiju Replaced by Arjun Ram Meghwal as Law Minister: A Surprise Cabinet Reshuffle

NEW DELHI: In a surprise development, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju was on Thursday divested of Law and Justice Ministry portfolio and made the Minister for Earth Sciences.

According to a notification, Arjun Ram Meghwal will be a Minister of State in Law Ministry with independent charge.

In his reaction, Rijiju said it was a privilege to serve as Union Minister of Law and Justice and thanked the entire judiciary, including Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, for their "huge support".

He further said that he is now looking forward to fulfilling Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision in the Earth Sciences Ministry.

In a tweet, he said, "It has been a privilege and an honour to serve as Union Minister of Law and Justice under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji."

He also thanked Chief Justice of India Chandrachud, all judges of the Supreme Court, Chief Justices and judges of high courts, lower judiciary and law officers for the "huge support" in ensuring delivering ease of justice and providing legal services for citizens.

"I look forward to fulfilling the vision of PM Narendra Modi ji in the Earth Sciences Ministry with the same zeal and vigour I have imbibed as a humble 'karyakarta' of (the) BJP," he said.

Rijiju is a three-term Lok Sabha member from Arunachal Pradesh.

His replacement, Meghwal was Minister of State for Finance and Parliamentary Affairs.

Notably, a Minister of State with independent charge is a minister without an overseeing Cabinet Minister in the State or Union Government of India.

Such a minister is in charge of his ministry, unlike Minister of State who is also a Minister but assists a cabinet minister.

In his tenure, Rijiju has taken on the judiciary a number of times and repeatedly slammed the Collegium system for appointment of judges, saying nowhere in the world judges appointed themselves.

On January 6, he shot off a letter to Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud for including a government's nominee in the process for picking up judges, stirring up a big controversy.

However, it was later transpired that the letter had sought inclusion of a central government's nominee in search-cum-evaluation committee, as part of the Memorandum of Procedure to be formulated in terms of the Supreme Court's judgement in the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act case.

In January, he had expressed his concern with the Supreme Court Collegium publishing inputs of Research & Analysis Wing (R&AW) and Intelligence Bureau (IB) on candidates recommended for judgeship, saying it is a serious issue.

In a programme organised by the Delhi Bar Association, the Minister had in January fired a fresh salvo against the judiciary by saying judges don't face public scrutiny, they don't stand for elections but are being constantly observed by people.

"The people are watching. How you work, what you do, your judgements. People are seeing this and forming opinions. No one can hide in the time of social media," he said.

He had also tweeted a video of a retired high court judge, Justice R S Sodhi who said the Supreme Court hijacked the Constitution by deciding to appoint judges itself. The Minister said he considered the former judges view sane. The Law Minister said the majority of the people have similar views.

Sharing the interview by a portal LawStreet Bharat, Rijiju has then tweeted , Voice of a judge...Real beauty of Indian Democracy is- it's success. People rule themselves through their representatives. Elected representatives represent the interests of the people & make laws. Our Judiciary is independent and our Constitution is Supreme.

In another tweet, the Minister had said: Actually majority of the people have similar sane views. It's only those people who disregard the provisions of the Constitution and mandate of the people think that they are above the Constitution of India.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kiren Rijiju Replaced by Arjun Ram Meghwal as Law Minister: A Surprise Cabinet Reshuffle Kiren Rijiju Replaced by Arjun Ram Meghwal as Law Minister: A Surprise Cabinet Reshuffle

Arjun Ram Meghwal will assume the role of Minister of State in the Law Ministry with independent charge.

Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed [Read Statement] Number of Constitution bench matters reduced drastically over decades, Lok Sabha informed [Read Statement]

Discover how the number of Constitution bench cases decided by the Supreme Court has decreased drastically over the years, from 440 in the 1950s to only 71 in the 2010s. Currently, 29 cases are pending for adjudication, shedding light on the significance of these benches in interpreting the Constitution.

Womens Reservation Bill in Rajya Sabha Today, a step away from history Womens Reservation Bill in Rajya Sabha Today, a step away from history

Get the latest on India's historic move towards women's reservation in legislative bodies with the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023. Explore its highlights, objectives, and timeline for implementation.

No consensus yet on setting up of all-India judicial service: Law Ministry No consensus yet on setting up of all-India judicial service: Law Ministry

Read about the government's plan to set up All India Judicial Service.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email