38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Lakhimpur Kheri case: SC asks UP cops to find out if Ashish Mishra tried influencing witnesses

By Jhanak Sharma      20 January, 2025 03:54 PM      0 Comments
Lakhimpur Kheri case SC asks UP cops to find out if Ashish Mishra tried influencing witnesses

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Superintendent of Police, Lakhimpur, to conduct an enquiry into the allegations that Ashish Mishra, son of former Union Minister Ajay Mishra Teni, an accused in a case related to mowing down of eight persons, tried to influence the witnesses in the case.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh ordered for verifying the authenticity of the allegations in the application, seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Mishra alleging that he was trying to influence the witnesses in the case.

SC Orders Probe into Allegations Against Ashish Mishra in Lakhimpur Kheri Case

On July 22, 2023, the Supreme Court had granted him bail to Ashish with slew of directions.

Lakhimpur Kheri Case Update: Supreme Court Questions Witness Tampering Claims

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Mishra, vehemently denied the allegations of the family members and said that the application was publicity oriented..

Also Read: Lakhimpur Kheri case: SC directs ex Union Minister's son to file affidavit on allegations on threatening witnesses

He said, on the relevant day, Mishra was at the Lok Sabha secretariat and there cannot be a bigger proof of the allegations being misplaced. "The applicants (Family members) have developed a habit of repeatedly making such kind of allegations against Mishra," Dave argued.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the family members, said that the identity of the witnesses sought to be influenced can't be revealed due to fear of reprisal.

"The bail of the accused (Ashish Mishra) be canceled immediately on breach of SC's orders," he argued before the Apex court.

Upon hearing the submissions of both the parties -- family members and Ashish Mishra -- the top court said that in such scenario, a parallel enquiry may be required to find out if the person alleged of trying to influence is Mishra's associate or planted by someone else.

Also Read: Supreme Court to hear the PIL seeking probe into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case [Live Updates]

The bench said, "In our view, the veracity, genuineness and reliability of such material can be gone into by police administration who will submit a report on the allegations made."

According to the prosecution, eight persons, including four farmers, were allegedly killed on October 3, 2021, after violence broke out in the Lakhimpur Kheri district of state of Uttar Pradesh during a protest against the Centre’s farm laws that have now been repealed. The farmer bodies, in the case, have alleged that a vehicle belonging to accused Mishra had run over a group of demonstrators.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email