38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Let political battles be fought in electorate,' SC refuses to entertain ED's plea against Ktka CM's wife in MUDA scam

By Harshvardhan Sharma      21 July, 2025 04:56 PM      0 Comments
Let political battles be fought in electorate SC refuses to entertain EDs plea against Ktka CMs wife in MUDA scam

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to consider a plea by the Enforcement Directorate against the Karnataka High Court's order which quashed the criminal proceedings in a money laundering case against State Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in connection with a scam in Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) land allotment.

A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and K Vinod Chandran also recorded its concern over the alleged misuse of the Enforcement Directorate for political purposes.

"Let political battles be fought in the electorate. Why are you being used," the court asked Additional Solicitor General S V Raju.

"Please don't ask us to open our mouth, otherwise, we will be forced to make some harsh comments about the ED," the bench also cautioned the law officer, who promptly agreed to withdraw the special leave petition.

"We will withdraw but this should not be treated as a precedent," Raju said.

On March 7, this year, the Karnataka High Court had quashed the alleged money laundering proceedings initiated against Parvathi and Urban Development Minister Byrathi Suresh by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with alleged illegal allotment of sites by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority.

Parvathi had contended that she had surrendered the 14 sites, and that she was neither in possession of nor enjoying any ‘so-called proceeds of crime’.

She had questioned the haste with which the ED initiated proceedings under PMLA based on the basis of an FIR registered by the Lokayukta police on trial court’s order in the case of alleged illegality in allotment of sites to various persons by MUDA.

It was alleged that Siddaramaiah used his political influence to get compensation for 14 sites in the name of his wife Parvathi in lieu of three acres and 16 guntas of land acquired by the MUDA.

The land was originally acquired by MUDA for Rs 3.24 lakh. The compensation in the form of 14 sites at the posh Vijayanagar locality in Mysuru was worth approximately Rs 56 crore.

The opposition parties claimed the scam related to the allocation of compensatory sites by the MUDA was to the tune Rs 4,000 Cr.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email