38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Extends Limitation period under Sec. 29A & 24(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Sec. 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [READ ORDER]

By Ayushi Wargantiwar      15 July, 2020 04:08 PM      0 Comments
SC Extends Limitation period under

On July 10th, 2020, SC has extended the limitation period for filing of cases under Sec. 29A and 23(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 taking into account the difficulty faced by lawyers and litigants by the lockdown.

Earlier under section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, there was no limitation period, but time was fixed to do certain acts. Now, there is an extension of time limit for passing arbitral award under sec. 29A of the said act.

Similarly, under Sec. 23(4) of the said act provided 6 months for the completion of the statement of claim and defense and now the given time frame has been extended under the said section.

In Addition to this in section 12 of the Commercial Courts Act, a certain time was prescribed for completing the process of compulsory pre-litigation, mediation, and settlement but according to SC direction, this time frame would be extended from time to time as the lockdown gets lifted plus 45 days thereafter.

The bench also allowed the use of electronic means such as e-mail, messenger service (like WhatsApp) for service of notice. Due to the nationwide lockdown, it has become difficult to go to Post Office to post the notice, therefore the SC allowed sending of notices through messaging services, WhatsApp, telegram, Signal, etc.

The court did not extend the validity of cheque as such period is not mentioned in any statues but RBI has prescribed it under sec. 35A of Banking and Regulation Act. Therefore, the court did not interfere with the period prescribed by the RBI since the entire banking system works on the said period.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email