38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Litigants with no regard for truth need to be thrown out of court: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      27 March, 2025 07:18 PM      0 Comments
Litigants with no regard for truth need to be thrown out of court SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said cases of those litigants who have no regard for the truth and those who indulge in suppressing material facts need to be thrown out of the court.

The court emphasised if material facts and documents are suppressed in a complaint filed under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the complainant cannot be allowed to set criminal law in motion.

SC Slams Litigants for Suppressing Facts, Quashes Cheque Bounce Case

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan quashed criminal proceedings in a case of cheque dishonour, holding setting criminal law in motion by suppressing material facts and documents is nothing but an abuse of the process of law.  

After considering facts of the matter, the court, in its judgment, said the High Court ought to have interfered and quashed the complaint as this was a case where very material documents in the form of two letters addressed by the appellant were suppressed in the complaint and the statement on oath under Section 200 CrPC.

"Setting criminal law in motion is a serious matter. The accused faces serious consequences in the sense that he has to defend himself in the trial," the bench said.

The court also pointed out it is settled law that a litigant who, while filing proceedings in the court, suppresses material facts or makes a false statement, cannot seek justice from the court.

Supreme Court: Misuse of Criminal Law by Hiding Facts is Abuse of Process

"The facts suppressed must be material and relevant to the controversy, which may have a bearing on the decision making," the bench pointed out.

The bench allowed a plea by Rekha Sharad Ushir against the Bombay High Court's order of December 18, 2023.

It respondent Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahkari Patsansta Ltd has suppressed the reply of November 28, 2016 and the letter of December 13, 2016 sent by the appellant’s advocate with regard to dishonour of cheque to the sum of Rs 27,27,460 out of an overdraft facility.

"The respondent made out a false case that the appellant did not reply to the demand notice. Moreover, the case that the documents as demanded were supplied is not pleaded in the complaint and statement under Section 200 of CrPC," the bench said.

A case was belatedly made out for the first time by filing an additional affidavit on January 9, 2025 that statements of loan account sought by the appellant were furnished to her and her signature appears on the statements, the court said.

The stand taken in January 2025 that the statement of accounts was supplied on November 29, 2016 is clearly an "afterthought," the bench said.

The bench felt, had the complete facts been disclosed, the Magistrate could have dismissed the complaint by exercising power under Section 203 of CrPC, as the appellant could not have replied to the statutory notice without looking at the documents relied upon.

The court pointed out, after a complaint is filed under Section 200 of the CrPC (corresponding provisions of Section 223 under Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), the Magistrate is duty-bound to examine the complainant on oath and witnesses, if any, present and reduce the substance of such examination into writing. What is reduced into writing is required to be signed by the complainant and witnesses, if any, the bench said.

In its observations, the bench said, "Recording the complainant's statement on oath under Section 200 of the CrPC is not an empty formality. The object of recording the complainant's statement and witnesses, if any, is to ascertain the truth. The Magistrate is duty-bound to put questions to the complainant to elicit the truth. The examination is necessary to enable the court to satisfy itself whether there are sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused". 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email