38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

Live-in couples' pleadings are rarely based on the 'actual' or' real' existence of a threat, and they take up a lot of the court's time: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

By Kartikey Garg      16 June, 2021 03:31 PM      0 Comments
Live-in couples' pleadings are rarely based on the 'actual' or' real' existence of a threat, and they take up a lot of the court's time: High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently noted that the majority of petitions by Live-In couples contain formal symbolic averments, grounds with imaginary cause of action, and are rarely founded on the 'actual' or 'real' existence of threat when dealing with a protection plea of a couple who have not yet reached marriageable age. 

The case of Daya Ram (20 years old) and Reenu (14 years old) was heard by Justice Manoj Bajaj, who claimed that they had known each other for a year and had fallen in love over time, but that Reenu's parents were opposed to their relationship.

They claimed that they are mature enough to understand good and bad, and that they have decided to marry, but their proposal was rejected by Reenu's parents and other relatives. It was also argued that they had no choice but to live together in a live-in relationship, and that there has been no physical intimacy between the petitioners to date because they are waiting to reach the statutory marriageable age, so the private respondents have no right to interfere in their lives.

The Court made the following observations: 

At the outset, the Court noted that society has been experiencing profound changes in social values, particularly among exuberant youngsters, who rarely, in pursuit of absolute freedom, leave the company of their parents, etc. to live with the person of their choice, and further, they try to get the seal of the court on their alliance by filing pecuniary petitions. Notably, the Court stated: "Such petitions are typically based solely on the fear of a threat being made against the disapproving parents or other close relatives of the girl, as the couple's decision is rarely opposed by the boy's family. Their right to live together is based on either their hasty, secret, and small destination wedding or their live-in relationship."

The Court did note, however, that aggrieved parties can pursue an alternative remedy, but that a large number of petitions end up in this court's hands because the alternative remedy is less favourable in writ petitions. "These types of cases eat up a lot of this court's time, and they do so at the expense of many other cases waiting to be heard," the Court added. The Court also stated that the concept of a live-in relationship between two adults of opposing gender has gained recognition in India, as the legislature has given this type of relationship some legitimacy by enacting the "Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005," which liberally defines "domestic relationship" in Section 2. (f). The Court did add, however, that despite this elasticity, some segments of society are hesitant to accept such relationships.

"Merely because the two adults are living together for a few days, their claim of live-in-relationship based on bald averment may not be enough to hold that they are truly in live-in-relationship," the Court concluded. In this case, the Court ordered the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, to appoint a responsible police officer to ensure that the minor girl's custody is returned to her parents after consultation with the Rajasthan police. Before departing, the Court stated that, despite the fact that the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, penal provisions are in place, child marriages continue to occur in violation of the Act's provisions, and thus, the High Court declined to provide them with protection, and the writ petition was dismissed, while noting that the issue of eradicating the child marriage menace needs to be addressed.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Gravity of offence not relevant when considering bail for juvenile [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants bail to a juvenile in a serious criminal case, ruling that the gravity of the offence is not a relevant factor in bail decisions.

22 June, 2024 11:18 AM
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email