38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madhya Pradesh High Court directs HPC to consider suggestions to decongest jails in the state in the wake of the second wave of COVID-19

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      24 May, 2021 03:26 PM      0 Comments
Madhya Pradesh High Court directs HPC to consider suggestions to decongest jails in the state in the wake of the second wave of COVID-19

A bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court comprising Chief Justice Mohammed Rafiq and Justice Atul Shreedharan, on Monday, May 17th, 2021 observed in the Suo Moto writ petition, initiated in view of the unprecedented situation faced by the country to decongest the jails.

In this regard, the Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the High-powered Committee to consider the suggestions received by it and make its recommendation about release of prisoners. It was observed that the number of prisoners lodged in the different jails of the State of Madhya Pradesh, which was 45,582, is not going to be substantially reduced.

The suggestions, thus made in the wake of the situations, may not achieve and it was suggested that the High-Powered Committee ought to consider recommending the release of all such convicts on parole, who have either served out one third of the substantive sentence awarded to them or if sentenced to life imprisonment have completed incarceration of seven years or more.

The Senior Counsel and the Amicus Curiae suggested that the High-Powered Committee ought to also consider recommending release of all such under-trial prisoners on interim bail, who are facing trial for offences exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrate regardless of the outer limit of sentence.

Additionally, in the third put forth to the High-Powered Committed was recommended to release all women prisoners, both convicts and under rial regardless of the offence for which they have been convicted and the maximum sentence that may be awarded to them upon conviction.

The court directed that the data falling under the aforementioned category be provided to the High-Powered Committee and it shall convene a meeting and take into account the aforementioned suggestions while giving its recommendation.

Chander Uday Singh, Senior Counsel and Sankalp Kochar, Amicus Curiae, apprised the court that despite directions issued by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar case, the police in the state were not following the guidelines.

The court directed the Director-general of Police to immediately issue fresh directions to all the Police stations in the state to adhere to the guidelines issued and observed that in case of any arrest made without adherence to the guidelines, the accused concerned would be entitled to directly apply to the court of competent jurisdiction for his regular bail on this ground alone.

The Court directed the Registrar General of the High Court to again circulate the copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar along with copy of the new order of the High Court to all District Judges of the state, being served upon the Judicial Magistrate and also asked the Director of State Judicial Academy to organize online/virtual program, in a cluster of districts or division-wise, in batches for sensitizing, not only the Judicial Magistrate, but also the police officers.

The Court directed the Member Secretary of the MP State Legal Service Authority to require the Member Secretaries of all DLSA to move applications through their Legal Aid Counsel before the respective Juvenile Justice Board on behalf of the children on conflict with law, for their release from Observations Home across state. The applications should be considered and the same shall be decided within a period of three days from the date of filing in the light of the observations made by the Supreme Court, taking the proviso to Section 12 of Juvenile Justice Act into consideration.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email