38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 26, 2024
Judiciary

MP High Court Directs 9 Districts To Invoke Penal Provisions Of DMA/IPC Against Political/ Governmental/ State Or Social Functionaries

By RHEA BANERJEE      06 October, 2020 05:01 PM      0 Comments
MP HIGH COURT DIRECTS 9 DISTRICTS TO INVOKE PENAL PROVISIONS OF DMA/IPC AGAINST POLITICAL/ GOVERNMENTAL/ STATE OR SOCIAL FUNCTIONARIES

The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench decided on 3rd October 2020 Saturday to pass interim orders in the public interest to prevent the political flock in the State especially in the 9 districts which fall into the jurisdiction of the Gwalior Bench. 

The Division Bench comprised of Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Rajeev Kumar Shrivastav who issued interim orders taking into account the issue faced by the law enforcing personnel while he was trying to implement the COVID-19 protocol and also looking to the several occurrences brought on record of widespread violation of Covid-19 protocol mostly caused by the congregations of a large number of persons moving for and on behalf of the political leaders. 

It should be noted that on 18th September, the MP High Court had marked that, “law, whether statutory or in the shape of executive instructions, deserve respect and obedience, as much as from common man and as from a leader, political functionary and even the head of State.”

Thus, the court has passed the interim order to savor the interests of public, rather than the interest of the nation and stated that political functionaries and State Functionaries should strictly abide by the “Covid-19 protocol” as mentioned by the Central Government, State government and the District Magistrate of the respective district which is regulated from time to time regarding the congregation of any nature or kind. 

This cause was raised in the Public Interest Litigation by Advocate Sanjay Dwivedi, Advocate Raju Sharma, and Advocate VD Sharma who appealing for the rendering of justice for the concerned matter. However, on 25th September 2020, the Bench of Justices SheelNagu and Rajeev Kumar Shrivastav had noted that there was a rise in the number of COVID-19 cases in Gwalior and even in the number of deaths. 

So the Bench observed, “In such a situation if the Executive Authorities don’t avoid the congregation of a large number of people in violation of restrictions laid down by the Central and State government and the District Magistrate, then the Court will have to step in to do something which the Executives have failed to do so.” The Court even thought that the Executives were unable to contain the spread of COVID-19 as per the stated guidelines. 

The Court has further thought to hear the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police of the five districts namely Morena, Bhind, Gwalior, Datia, and Shivpuri through virtual conferencing on 30th September, Wednesday. 

Observations made by Court on 3rd October

After listening to the executive authorities of the 5 districts, the common link between all the revelations made by the authorities was that even though all the efforts were being made by them to ensure the compliance of Covid-19 protocol but usually on account of ignorance and lack of civic sense among the public, some breach happens. The executive authorities further suggested that it was not advisable to employ a force to contain the huge public as it would cause further damage than help in the current scenario. 

The Court looking into the situation where the bi-elections have been announced recently by the Election Commission of India for different seats in the 5 districts of MP, the flocking of people which are taking place now and then are mainly political in nature, and whether or not the political leaders who might be part of the State or government preside over these congregation of people. 

So, the Court noted, “The political functionaries and functionaries of the government and the State are duty-bound to set such examples of conduct, behavior, and deeds which aids their followers, voters, citizens to follow such path of rectitude and obedience of the law and lawfully passed orders and instructions.”

Lastly, the Court passed an interim order keeping in mind the interest of the general public at large and gave the following order- 

  1. The prevailing Covid-19 protocol as stated by the Central government, State government, and the District Magistrate have to comply within the 5 districts of the Madhya Pradesh by all the political parties participating in the upcoming bi-elections of the MP State Legislative Assembly in the stated 5 districts.
  2. The prevailing Covid-19 protocol has to be complied within the said 5 districts by all the public functionaries who are holding any public office by way of appointment or elections during the process of the MP Legislative Assembly elections.
  3. The Covid-19 restrictions and prohibitions imposed by the Election Commission of India in their Code of Conduct shall be strictly adhered to by all concerned including the government/political/State functionaries.
  4. The members of the political parties are advised not to physically conduct the election campaigns and instead try and adopt electronic means for the purpose
  5. In case, any of the restrictions, prohibitions, and precautions of the Covid-19 protocols are found to be breached by a congregation which is of political or social nature then the District Magistrates of the nine districts falling within the territorial jurisdiction of the Bench i.e. Gwalior, Guna, Morena, Bhind, Vidisha, Ashok Nagar, Datia, Shivpuri and Sheopur is directed by writ of mandamus to register offences by invoking penal provisions of the Disaster Management Act and the Indian Penal Code not only against the defaulting members of the congregation but also against political/ governmental/ state or social functionaries in whose name or on whose behest and behalf the said congregation takes place, failing which the District Magistrates of the concerned nine districts shall be liable for contempt of this Court and shall also be exposed to the rigors of penal provisions of relevant laws.

The three advocates who have been appointed as the Amicus Curiae are requested to keep an eye if any breach is witnessed in the implementation of the interim order or in the prevailing COVID-19 protocol and in case of any such breach is noticed by any citizen or the Amicus Curiae then the Principal Registrar is advocated to place the matter instantly before the Bench for adjudication. The next hearing of the matter is scheduled on 15th October 2020 Thursday. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

supreme-court-orders-man-to-pay-rs-25-lakh-for-misappropriating-wifes-jewellery-on-wedding-night
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Orders Man to Pay Rs 25 Lakh for Misappropriating Wife's Jewellery on Wedding Night [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court orders man to pay Rs 25 lakh for taking wife's jewelry in 2003, emphasizing her right to stridhan as absolute property.

25 April, 2024 03:31 PM
sc-advocate-calls-for-overhaul-of-costly-5-year-law-courses-proposes-4-year-blaw-program-under-nep-2020
Trending Judiciary
SC Advocate calls for overhaul of costly 5-year law courses, proposes 4-Year B.Law under NEP 2020

SC Advocate proposes a 4-year B.Law program under NEP 2020 to replace costly 5-year courses, citing financial and academic burdens.

25 April, 2024 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-medical-examination-of-yr-old-rape-survivor-seeking-to-terminate-her-week-pregnancy
Trending Judiciary
SC orders medical examination of 14-yr-old rape survivor seeking to terminate her 28-week pregnancy

Supreme Court orders medical examination of 14-year-old rape survivor seeking termination of 28-week pregnancy. Decision to be made after evaluating impact on her health.

20 April, 2024 11:00 AM
a-critique-of-the-supreme-courts-adventurism-for-lgbtqia-rights
Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
new-criminal-laws-watershed-moment-for-society-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM
sc-grants-permission-for-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-of-14-yr-old-rape-survivor
Trending Judiciary
SC grants permission for medical termination of pregnancy of 14-yr-old rape survivor

Supreme Court grants medical termination of pregnancy to 14-yr-old rape survivor after assessing adverse health impacts, setting aside Bombay HC's decision.

22 April, 2024 12:14 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email