38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 05, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Dont Use Social Media For 1 Year,' Madras HC Asks Man Booked For Posting Against PM Modi [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      11 November, 2019 01:11 PM      0 Comments
'Dont Use Social Media For 1 Year,' Madras HC Asks Man Booked For Posting Against PM Modi [Read Order]

The Madras High Court on November 4, 2019, in the case of Jabin Charles v. State, has imposed a baffling condition on a man as a requirement to get an anticipatory bail. 

A single-judge Bench of Justice G.R. Swaminathan has asked aTamil Nadu resident to stay away from social media for a period of one year. This was imposed as a condition for granting anticipatory bail for an alleged post against Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Facebook.

The police had registered an FIR against Kanyakumari resident Jabin Charles under Section 505 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, for posts relating to the Prime Minister.

The court granted the anticipatory bail noting that:

"The petitioner's counsel, on instructions, gives an undertaking that the petitioner would file an affidavit expressing his apology before the trial Magistrate. The apology should be worded in such a way that the petitioner expresses his regret. It should be evident that he has realized his mistake.

The petitioner's counsel, on instructions, gives an further undertaking that for the next one year, the petitioner will not be in the social media. 

However, granting the anticipatory bail, the court clarified thatif the petitioner is found using social media, contrary to the undertaking, the prosecution could move the court for cancelling the anticipatory bail.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM

TOP STORIES

the-digital-ticking-clock-navigating-the-legal-nuances-of-indias-gig-economy
Trending Business
The Digital Ticking Clock: Navigating the Legal Nuances of India’s Gig Economy

India’s gig economy faces legal churn as 10-minute delivery rolls back. Examining Social Security Code, algorithmic control, and worker rights.

30 January, 2026 02:05 PM
kerala-hc-quashes-bar-associations-sexual-harassment-committee-holds-advocates-bodies-not-employers-under-posh-act
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Quashes Bar Association’s Sexual Harassment Committee, Holds Advocates’ Bodies Not “Employers” Under POSH Act [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court quashes Kollam Bar Association’s ICC, holding bar associations are not “employers” under the POSH Act.

30 January, 2026 02:20 PM
madras-hc-declines-to-interfere-with-academic-authorities-decision-on-gold-medal-conferment
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Declines to Interfere with Academic Authorities’ Decision on Gold Medal Conferment [Read Order]

Madras High Court declined to interfere with academic authorities’ decision on gold medal conferment, holding such matters should be left to academicians.

30 January, 2026 02:27 PM
can-applications-for-extension-of-arbitration-time-limit-be-filed-before-civil-court-when-high-court-appoints-arbitrator-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can Applications For Extension Of Arbitration Time Limit Be Filed Before Civil Court When High Court Appoints Arbitrator? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules Section 29A extension pleas lie before civil courts even when arbitrator is appointed by High Court, settling conflicting HC views.

30 January, 2026 02:40 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email