38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

By Tanurag Ghosh      17 June, 2020 07:36 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

Tamil Nadu is the second worst-hit state by the COVID-19 pandemic. With more than 48,000 cases, the daily movement of the entire state population has come to a grinding halt. The government is taking measures to ensure that the outbreak is controlled with an imposition of a strict lockdown in the major city of Chennai also been ordered. 

At such a time, essential activities have been consistently trudging along. One of the most of them, i.e., the dispensation of education has shifted entirely to online platforms. Schools are now using methods of videoconferencing to make sure students attend classes. However, the underlying requirement for access to the internet and its contents by young children certainly poses several issues with regard to safety and exposure.

Taking cognizance of this, the government of Karnataka has ordered that online classes should not take place for children in grades LKG to V. Other state governments have also constituted committees to deliberate upon a solution for this situation. 

With regards to Tamil Nadu, a petition was filed in the High Court of Madras regarding regulation for online classes. The petition contended that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, conducting online classes in the absence of laws that keep a check on the material being circulated among the students is unwarranted. It also claimed that conducting classes without the requisite laws is not congenial for the purpose of education.

It contended that there exist grey areas in the rules, namely-

1) Information Technology Act. 2000 

2) Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring, and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009

3) Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data of Information) Rules, 2011

The Bench comprising of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R Suresh Kumar issued a notice to the Union government, Ministry of Information and Technology, Computer Emergency Response Team, and other authorities considering it a matter of enormous public importance. 

The Bench, however, did not grant any interim relief to the petitioner and consequently allowed schools and colleges to conduct online classes for the time being.

The Court remarked:

"There are no guidelines restricting or checking the material which pops up on the screen which may not be congenial for the education of the students, who are constrained to undergo Online Education."

The next hearing on the matter will take place on 25th June 2020, where the union government would provide a reasonable solution and a final decision will be made regarding online classes, which have become the new normal in the pandemic.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email