38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

By Tanurag Ghosh      17 June, 2020 07:36 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

Tamil Nadu is the second worst-hit state by the COVID-19 pandemic. With more than 48,000 cases, the daily movement of the entire state population has come to a grinding halt. The government is taking measures to ensure that the outbreak is controlled with an imposition of a strict lockdown in the major city of Chennai also been ordered. 

At such a time, essential activities have been consistently trudging along. One of the most of them, i.e., the dispensation of education has shifted entirely to online platforms. Schools are now using methods of videoconferencing to make sure students attend classes. However, the underlying requirement for access to the internet and its contents by young children certainly poses several issues with regard to safety and exposure.

Taking cognizance of this, the government of Karnataka has ordered that online classes should not take place for children in grades LKG to V. Other state governments have also constituted committees to deliberate upon a solution for this situation. 

With regards to Tamil Nadu, a petition was filed in the High Court of Madras regarding regulation for online classes. The petition contended that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, conducting online classes in the absence of laws that keep a check on the material being circulated among the students is unwarranted. It also claimed that conducting classes without the requisite laws is not congenial for the purpose of education.

It contended that there exist grey areas in the rules, namely-

1) Information Technology Act. 2000 

2) Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring, and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009

3) Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data of Information) Rules, 2011

The Bench comprising of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R Suresh Kumar issued a notice to the Union government, Ministry of Information and Technology, Computer Emergency Response Team, and other authorities considering it a matter of enormous public importance. 

The Bench, however, did not grant any interim relief to the petitioner and consequently allowed schools and colleges to conduct online classes for the time being.

The Court remarked:

"There are no guidelines restricting or checking the material which pops up on the screen which may not be congenial for the education of the students, who are constrained to undergo Online Education."

The next hearing on the matter will take place on 25th June 2020, where the union government would provide a reasonable solution and a final decision will be made regarding online classes, which have become the new normal in the pandemic.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

reimagining-womens-trauma-a-feminist-study-of-modern-indian-women-authors
Trending Vantage Points
Reimagining Women's Trauma: A Feminist Study of Modern Indian Women Authors

A feminist socio-legal study examining how modern Indian women authors reimagine trauma as resistance, agency, and dignity within evolving legal frameworks.

17 March, 2026 01:27 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email