38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, July 13, 2024

Madras High Court Orders 5 Lakhs Compensation to Man Who Lost Wife Due to Non-Availability of Ambulance at Health Centre [READ ORDER]

By Nancy Goyal      08 July, 2021 02:46 PM      0 Comments
Madras High Court Compensation Ambulance at Health Centre

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the State Government to pay Rs. 5,00,000/- compensation to the husband of a woman who died due to the non-availability of an ambulance at a Primary Health Centre (PHC) and the resultant delay in shifting her to the Medical College for proper treatment.

A bench by Judge N. Anand Venkatesh held that, although no medical negligence was caused to the petitioner's wife, the delay in her transfer to the medical college, proved to be fatal, resulting in her death.

The court remarked that, 

"There was a delay in shifting the deceased from the Primary Health Centre to the Medical College, Asaripallam. When it comes to saving a life, every second count and delay by even a few minutes can cause the death of a person. Therefore, when it comes to medical emergencies, delay can never be condoned like how leniently we condone in Courts".


The petitioner’s wife was hospitalized for childbirth at the Primary Health Center (PHC). After giving birth to her daughter, she suffered from excessive bleeding. The primary care center discovered that a blood transfusion was necessary while treating her and recommended that transfer her to Asari Paran Medical College. As the primary health care center did not have an ambulance, the nurse had to call ambulance 108. It took 30 minutes to get to the primary health care center. After 1 hour and 15 minutes, the deceased's wife finally reached medical school., where she was declared dead. According to medical records, the cause of death was "postpartum hemorrhage."

The petitioner's case was that he lost his life due to the absence of an ambulance and the delay in reaching the Medical College.

District medical officials, the Rural Health and Medical Bureau, Kanyakumari, and the surgeon on duty denied the allegations of not providing medical aid. They submitted that the doctor and the nurse on duty jointly referred the patient to the medical school and called the ambulance 108, which arrived immediately.

Regarding the situation that the primary health center has an ambulance, the counter-affidavit stated that there is no ambulance 108 in the primary health center. It has only a wheeled hospital van, which only runs during the day to meet the medical needs of people in remote areas.


The court emphasized the respondent’s statement that in 4-6% of cases, postpartum hemorrhage may occur during childbirth, which is a common cause of postpartum maternal death in India.

The court held that,

"It is clear from the above that the condition that was suffered by the petitioner's wife is not uncommon and unfortunately the wife of the petitioner falls under the category of 4 to 6 percent cases, who undergo such Complications".

However, it clarified that the death of the woman cannot be attributed to the negligence of the doctor who treated her because he took the necessary medications as first aid and tried to control the situation.

The Court continued to add that there was a delay in shifting the petitioner's wife from the Primary Health Centre to the Medical College, which ultimately proved fatal and caused her death. Here, the court reviewed the concept of golden hours proposed by R. Adams Cowley, that is, the time between life and death.

To emphasize that the PHC needs an ambulance, the court also referred to the case of PB Khet Mazdoor Samity v. West Bengal AIR 1996 SC 2426, in which the Supreme Court made 7 recommendations regarding proper medical facilities for emergencies. It included adequate facilities at PHC, upgrading hospitals at district and sub-district levels to treat serious cases and specialist treatment, a centralized communication system to track the availability of beds, proper arrangement of the adequately equipped ambulance.

Finally, the court ordered the state government to compensate the petitioner Rs 5,00,000 /, from the GO video created by Corpus Fund, dated 09.04.201.



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM


Trending Judiciary
SC to Hear Various Pleas Challenging NEET-UG Exam Today

The Supreme Court will hear pleas challenging the NEET-UG exam today, with students raising concerns over malpractice and irregularities in the 2024 test.

08 July, 2024 10:23 AM
Trending Judiciary
Courts can't ask accused to share Google PIN location as bail condition: SC

Courts can't mandate sharing Google PIN location as bail condition, protecting privacy rights: Supreme Court. Decision overturns Delhi HC's bail condition requiring Google PIN sharing.

08 July, 2024 12:13 PM
Trending Judiciary
Madhya Pradesh HC quashes FIR in rape case, rules consensual relationship cannot be termed rape [Read Order]

Madhya Pradesh HC quashes FIR in rape case, ruling consensual relationship between adults, even if promise of marriage is broken, cannot be termed rape.

08 July, 2024 12:47 PM
Trending Judiciary
Uttarakhand HC seeks State’s response on arresting minors found dating [Read Order]

Uttarakhand High Court seeks the state's response on arresting minors found dating, suggesting alternatives like counseling and statement recording.

08 July, 2024 01:34 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email