38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, November 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

By LawStreet News Network      03 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

On 28 January 2020, the Income Tax (IT) Department withdrew three tax appeal cases against actor Rajinikanth which were filed in the Madras High Court against the orders given in 2014 in favour of the actor. The actor was alleged to have concealed the particulars of his income from the years 2002 to 2005. 

A division bench consisting of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R. Suresh Kumar of the Madras High dismissed the appeals filed against the above decision. The bench accepted a request made by M. Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel for the IT Department, to withdraw the appeals in view of the decision taken by Central Board of Director Taxes (CBDT) to avoid litigation by dropping legal proceedings in claims where the recoverable amount was less than 1 crore. In this case the value of claims stands above 65 lakhs.

The story so far is that Rajinikanth had disclosed Rs. 61.12 lakhs, Rs. 1.75 crores and Rs. 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively.  However, IT noticed that he had claimed a huge amount of professional expenditure and therefore carried out a survey at his Poes Garden residence in 2005.After the survey, Rajinikanth filed revised returns for all three years in question and claimed that he had earned more than what was disclosed in the original returns. The assessing officer had then invoked penalty proceedings, which Rajinikanth opposed in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which set aside a penalty of 66.21 Lakh imposed on him for allegedly concealing full particulars of income and providing inaccurate information. Assailing the ITATs order before the court, the IT department claimed that the tribunals order was erroneous in law. In its pleadings before the court, the IT Department stated that the leading film actor had disclosed 61.12 lakhs, 1.75 crores and 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively. This was apart from 1.41 lakh and 1.09 lakh of his agricultural income disclosed in his returns for the financial years 2002-03 and 2004-05.

Rajinikanth is one of the most influential actors in the country. He has been awarded with the Padma Bhushan and has almost 46 awards to his credit. He even worked as a producer and screenwriter. He is currently working on his upcoming project Thalaivar 168.

Author: Meher Mansi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

faith-must-be-conviction-not-compulsion-in-tribal-conversion-cases-chhattisgarh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Faith Must Be Conviction, Not Compulsion, in Tribal Conversion Cases: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court rules that religious conversion in tribal areas must be based on conviction, not inducement or coercion, stressing protection of indigenous culture.

04 November, 2025 12:02 PM
allahabad-hc-quashes-false-religious-conversion-fir-imposes-75000-exemplary-costs-on-uttar-pradesh-govt
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Quashes False Religious Conversion FIR, Imposes ₹75,000 Exemplary Costs on Uttar Pradesh Govt [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court quashes false religious conversion FIR, slams police for illegal arrest, and orders ₹75,000 compensation for wrongful detention in UP.

04 November, 2025 12:17 PM
objection-petitions-under-section-47-cpc-should-not-be-treated-as-commencement-of-a-new-trial-sc
Trending Judiciary
Objection Petitions under Section 47 CPC should not be treated as commencement of a new trial: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that objections under Section 47 CPC cannot be treated as a new trial; abuse of process must be curbed to ensure decree-holders get justice.

04 November, 2025 12:42 PM
income-tax-reassessment-after-3-years-needs-chief-commissioner-approval-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income Tax Reassessment After 3 Years Needs Chief Commissioner Approval: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules income tax reassessment beyond three years invalid without approval from top authority under new regime, ensuring taxpayer safeguards.

04 November, 2025 12:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email