38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

By LawStreet News Network      03 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

On 28 January 2020, the Income Tax (IT) Department withdrew three tax appeal cases against actor Rajinikanth which were filed in the Madras High Court against the orders given in 2014 in favour of the actor. The actor was alleged to have concealed the particulars of his income from the years 2002 to 2005. 

A division bench consisting of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R. Suresh Kumar of the Madras High dismissed the appeals filed against the above decision. The bench accepted a request made by M. Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel for the IT Department, to withdraw the appeals in view of the decision taken by Central Board of Director Taxes (CBDT) to avoid litigation by dropping legal proceedings in claims where the recoverable amount was less than 1 crore. In this case the value of claims stands above 65 lakhs.

The story so far is that Rajinikanth had disclosed Rs. 61.12 lakhs, Rs. 1.75 crores and Rs. 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively.  However, IT noticed that he had claimed a huge amount of professional expenditure and therefore carried out a survey at his Poes Garden residence in 2005.After the survey, Rajinikanth filed revised returns for all three years in question and claimed that he had earned more than what was disclosed in the original returns. The assessing officer had then invoked penalty proceedings, which Rajinikanth opposed in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which set aside a penalty of 66.21 Lakh imposed on him for allegedly concealing full particulars of income and providing inaccurate information. Assailing the ITATs order before the court, the IT department claimed that the tribunals order was erroneous in law. In its pleadings before the court, the IT Department stated that the leading film actor had disclosed 61.12 lakhs, 1.75 crores and 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively. This was apart from 1.41 lakh and 1.09 lakh of his agricultural income disclosed in his returns for the financial years 2002-03 and 2004-05.

Rajinikanth is one of the most influential actors in the country. He has been awarded with the Padma Bhushan and has almost 46 awards to his credit. He even worked as a producer and screenwriter. He is currently working on his upcoming project Thalaivar 168.

Author: Meher Mansi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email