38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 22, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

By LawStreet News Network      03 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC: Tax Appeal Cases Against Rajnikanth Withdrawn by Income Tax Department

On 28 January 2020, the Income Tax (IT) Department withdrew three tax appeal cases against actor Rajinikanth which were filed in the Madras High Court against the orders given in 2014 in favour of the actor. The actor was alleged to have concealed the particulars of his income from the years 2002 to 2005. 

A division bench consisting of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R. Suresh Kumar of the Madras High dismissed the appeals filed against the above decision. The bench accepted a request made by M. Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel for the IT Department, to withdraw the appeals in view of the decision taken by Central Board of Director Taxes (CBDT) to avoid litigation by dropping legal proceedings in claims where the recoverable amount was less than 1 crore. In this case the value of claims stands above 65 lakhs.

The story so far is that Rajinikanth had disclosed Rs. 61.12 lakhs, Rs. 1.75 crores and Rs. 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively.  However, IT noticed that he had claimed a huge amount of professional expenditure and therefore carried out a survey at his Poes Garden residence in 2005.After the survey, Rajinikanth filed revised returns for all three years in question and claimed that he had earned more than what was disclosed in the original returns. The assessing officer had then invoked penalty proceedings, which Rajinikanth opposed in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which set aside a penalty of 66.21 Lakh imposed on him for allegedly concealing full particulars of income and providing inaccurate information. Assailing the ITATs order before the court, the IT department claimed that the tribunals order was erroneous in law. In its pleadings before the court, the IT Department stated that the leading film actor had disclosed 61.12 lakhs, 1.75 crores and 33.93 lakhs as his income for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively. This was apart from 1.41 lakh and 1.09 lakh of his agricultural income disclosed in his returns for the financial years 2002-03 and 2004-05.

Rajinikanth is one of the most influential actors in the country. He has been awarded with the Padma Bhushan and has almost 46 awards to his credit. He even worked as a producer and screenwriter. He is currently working on his upcoming project Thalaivar 168.

Author: Meher Mansi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM
madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM
can-courts-convict-an-accused-when-the-rape-victim-turns-hostile-supreme-court-says-no
Trending Judiciary
Can Courts Convict an Accused When the Rape Victim Turns Hostile? Supreme Court Says ‘No’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court acquits rape accused, holding courts cannot presume a victim was “won over” if she turns hostile; FIR alone cannot sustain conviction.

17 December, 2025 08:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email