38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, September 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Magistrate not Required to Request Permission from Company Court While Handing Over Possession u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002: SC

By Atharwa Gauraha      09 November, 2020 08:21 PM      0 Comments
Magistrate not Required to Request Permission from Company CourtWhile Handing Over Possession u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002: SC

The Supreme Court held that a magistrate exercising jurisdiction under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 is not necessary to obtain permission from the Judge of the Company Court before ordering the transfer of possession of the properties.

The bench consisting of Justice L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and Ajay Rastogi stated that under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, a company court exercising jurisdiction under the Companies Act has no control over the sale of a secured asset by a secured creditor in the exercise of powers available to that creditor.

In this case, the borrower company was issued a notice under Section 13(2) SARFAESI Act 2002, demanding an amount of Rs. 309.91 crores. Meanwhile, another creditor initiated winding up proceedings against this company before the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. The company judge passed an order of winding up and an Official Liquidator was appointed.

In the meantime, the bank filed an application with the Chief Judicial Magistrate under the SARFEASI Act, 2002 based on section 14 for the appointment of a receiver to take over physical custody of the land. The property was taken into custody by the Advocate Commissioner, appointed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

In an interim order, in the written petition lodged by the creditor corporation, the High Court directed the property to be restored on the ground that the Chief Judicial Magistrate was unable to order the delivery of the property without receiving permission from the Company Court (High Court).

The Apex court bench thus noted, while setting aside the interim order:

"The interim order passed by the High Court is on the basis that the Magistrate could not have directed the possession to be taken without seeking permission from the Company Court. This Court in Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Haryana Concast Limited and Another (2016) 4 SCC 47, concluded that a Company Court exercising jurisdiction under the Companies Act has no control in respect of the sale of a secured asset by a secured creditor in the exercise of powers available to such creditor under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Therefore, there is no requirement for the Magistrate exercising power under Section 14 SARFAESI Act to seek permission from the Company Judge before directing handing over of possession of a property."

In Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited, the Court held that, according to the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, the company judge should not intervene in a proceeding by a secured creditor to realize its secured interests.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-schedules-udhayanidhi-stalins-plea-to-club-firs-over-controversial-sanatan-dharma
Trending Judiciary
SC Schedules Udhayanidhi Stalin’s Plea to Club FIRs Over Controversial Sanatan Dharma Remarks in 2026

SC schedules hearing in 2026 on Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to club FIRs over his controversial ‘Sanatan Dharma’ remarks filed across multiple states.

02 September, 2025 11:01 AM
deliberate-concealment-of-absence-of-uterus-constitutes-fraud-under-section-12-1-c-of-the-hindu-marriage-act
Trending Judiciary
Deliberate Concealment Of Absence Of Uterus Constitutes Fraud Under Section 12 (1)(C) Of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds annulment of marriage, ruling concealment of absence of uterus amounts to fraud under Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act.

02 September, 2025 11:13 AM

TOP STORIES

supreme-court-appoints-two-new-judges-justice-alok-aradhe-and-future-cji-vipul-pancholi
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Appoints Two New Judges: Justice Alok Aradhe & Future CJI Vipul Pancholi

SC gets two new judges — Justices Alok Aradhe and Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, with Pancholi set to be CJI in 2031. Oath administered by CJI Gavai.

29 August, 2025 02:23 PM
sc-to-hear-on-monday-pleas-to-extend-september-1-deadline-for-claims-objections-in-bihar-sir
Trending Judiciary
SC to hear on Monday pleas to extend September 8 deadline for claims, objections in Bihar SIR [Read Order]

SC to hear on Monday pleas seeking extension of Sept 8 deadline for filing claims, objections in Bihar voter list revision.

29 August, 2025 02:32 PM
sc-grants-bail-to-gangster-arun-gawali-in-murder-case-of-shiv-sena-corporator
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to 'gangster' Arun Gawali in murder case of Shiv Sena corporator [Read Order]

SC grants bail to ex-MLA Arun Gawali in 2007 murder case of Shiv Sena corporator after 18 years in jail; appeal hearing set for Feb 2026.

29 August, 2025 02:45 PM
prolonged-cohabitation-results-in-presumption-of-marriage-sc
Trending Judiciary
Prolonged cohabitation results in presumption of marriage: SC [Read Judgment]

Prolonged cohabitation presumes valid marriage unless disproved by strong evidence; woman’s silence seen as deliberate evasion, appeal dismissed: SC

29 August, 2025 02:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email