38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Maharashtra's Political Crises: PIL Filed In Bombay HC Seeking FIR For Public Nuisance & Sedition Against Uddhav Thackeray, Aaditya Thackeray & Raut

By Shashwata Sahu      28 June, 2022 06:03 PM      0 Comments
Maharashtra's Political Crises: PIL Filed In Bombay HC Seeking FIR For Public Nuisance & Sedition Against Uddhav Thackeray, Aaditya Thackeray & Raut

In the Bombay High Court, a public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed seeking investigation and registration of first information reports (FIRs) against Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Cabinet Minister Aaditya Thackeray and Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut for causing public nuisance.

Hemant Patil, a social activist, who filed the petition, also sought a court order restraining the Thackerays and Raut from holding news conferences, tours, or travel to different locations in Maharashtra in relation to the revolt of the Eknath Shinde faction's MLAs.

According to Patil, the dissident MLAs left the state during the political crisis merely to protect their lives after getting threats from the Thackeray and Raut clans.

When the Shiv Sena Legislature Party cadre started organising protests against the rebelling MLAs in different Maharashtra districts, the power struggle allegedly got worse with time, according to Patil. He said that all of this was instilling fear in the minds of the people, who were already anticipating riots and other forms of violence in the state.

The petition stated that,

"In most of the protests organized at the influence and instigation of respondents (Thackeray and Raut) in various district of State of Maharashtra antisocial elements have damaged public property in the State in front of police personals and there is situation of breach of law and order in the State for which the respondents are only responsible for the same."

Patil added that there has been a breach of peace in Maharashtra as evidenced by the Central government's providing Y+ protection to the rebel MLAs.

Through Advocate RN Kachave, Patil filed the PIL, which was abeyance by the Supreme Court, that the Director General of Police of Maharashtra conduct an investigation and file FIRs against the Thackeray duo and Raut for public nuisance (Sections 268 & 290 of IPC, 1860) and sedition (Section 124A of IPC).



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email