38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Refers Maratha Quota Case to Larger Bench as it Involves Interpretation of Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018 [READ ORDER]

By M.V. Manasa      14 September, 2020 12:15 PM      0 Comments
Maratha Quota refered Larger Bench SC

A Three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, referring to the Maratha quota issue, held that the 30% population in Maharashtra cannot be compared to marginalized sections of the society living in far-flung and remote areas. On Wednesday (September 9, 2020), Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and S Ravindra Bhat referring to the issue of Maharashtra state reservation for socially and educationally backward classes act said that the state has failed to make out a special case for providing reservation excess of 50%.

According to the bench, The social, educational and economic backwardness of a community, the existence of quantifiable data relating to the inadequacy of representation of the community in public services and deprivation of the benefits flowing from reservations to the community are not exceptional circumstances for providing reservations in excess of 50%.

The Supreme Court said that is the prima facie of the opinion that the Bombay High Court failed and committed an error in treating the mentioned factors as circumstances which are extraordinary, warranting relaxation of the strict rule of 50%.

The bench further added that Admittedly, reservation is provided to the Maratha community were implemented in educational institutions for one academic year only. Implementation of the act for admissions in educational institutions and appointments to public posts during the pendency of these appeals will cause irreparable loss to the candidates belonging to the open category.

The bench observed that keeping the Maratha reservation in jobs and education, it will be difficult to cancel the admissions made in the educational institutions and appointments made to the public posts by implementing the reservations as per the act. However, the apex court said that the admissions made to postgraduate medical courses shall not be altered.

Maharashtra earlier had passed a law that allowed a 16% quota in educational institutions and government jobs but when the law was challenged, the Bombay High Court defended the constitutional validity of the law of the state. But the court has somehow cut down a certain degree of quota and said it was not justifiable.

On July 27, the Maharashtra government assured the Supreme Court that it will not proceed with the recruitment process to fill up the vacancies on the basis of 12% Maratha reservation till September 15, but just except for the Department of Public health and medical education and research. On Wednesday, Supreme Court put an interim stay order on reservation for the Maratha community in government jobs and educational institutions for undergraduate courses in Maharashtra.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email