38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, July 23, 2024
Judiciary

Marriage doesn't eclipse right to privacy: Karnataka High Court [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      28 November, 2023 03:24 PM      0 Comments
Marriage doesnt eclipse right to privacy Karnataka High Court

NEW DELHI: The Karnataka High Court has said that the relationship by marriage neither eclipses the right to privacy of an Aadhaar card number holder nor do away with the procedural right guaranteed under Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits & Services) Act, 2016.

"The right to privacy of Aadhaar number holder preserves the autonomy of the individuals right to privacy which is conferred primacy and admits of no exception under the statutory scheme. The relationship by marriage which is a union of two partners does not eclipse the right to privacy which is the right of an individual and the autonomy of such individuals right stands recognized and protected by the procedure of hearing contemplated under Section 33," a division bench of Justices S Sunil Dutt Yadav and Vijaykumar A Patil said.

"The marriage by itself does not do away with the procedural right of hearing conferred under Section 33 of Aadhaar Act," the bench added.

In the present case, a wife had sought information contained in the Aadhaar Card of her husband, who was not available.

The wife, a resident of Hubballi, got married in November 2005 and the couple has a girl child.

In the proceedings initiated by her against her husband, the family court had awarded Rs 10,000 maintenance to her and another Rs 5,000 to their daughter. When this order could not be enforced as the husbands whereabouts were not ascertainable, she moved the UIDAI under RTI Act.

On February 25, 2021, her application was rejected by stating that there could be no disclosure of such information and matter has to be decided by a judge of the high court in terms of Section 33 of the Aadhaar Act.

The wife filed a plea in the high court and on February 8, 2023, the single bench directed for considering her application after issuing notice to the husband.

In its appeal, the UIDAI approached the division bench challenging the order.

It contended that adherence to section 33 (1) of the Aadhaar Act is mandatory and that any disclosure can be made only after an order passed by a judge of the high court in terms of the direction issued by the Apex Court.

The wife, on the contrary, said that after the marriage, the relationship of husband and wife results in merging of the identity of both and hence, there could be no objection divulging the information of the spouse at the instance of the other spouse.

The bench relied upon the landmark K S Puttaswamy case judgement by the Supreme Court which clearly held that a person whose information is sought to be divulged has right to put-forth his case before such disclosure in terms of section 33(1) of the Aadhaar Act.

The bench said that the marriage by itself does not do away with the procedural right of hearing conferred under Section 33 of Aadhaar Act.

The bench set aside the single judge order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration, with a direction that the husband is to be arrayed as a respondent in the proceedings.

"The rights conferred under Section 33 of Aadhaar Act requires order to be passed by a Court not inferior to that of a High Court Judge and to facilitate such right, the High Court is required to make appropriate provision in the applicable regime for such exercise of right which is a statutory right," the bench said. 

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Karnataka High Court: Cabinet Rank Status Not Equivalent to Ministerial Position [Read Order] Karnataka High Court: Cabinet Rank Status Not Equivalent to Ministerial Position [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court clarifies that Cabinet rank status does not equate to ministerial position, dismissing a PIL challenging political appointments to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.

Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy

Karnataka High Court protects journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Aaj Tak from coercive action over alleged 'fake news' about Karnataka government's minority scheme. Get the latest updates on this legal battle.

Ganeshotsav at Idgah Maidan: High Court Rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's Plea Against Ganesh Idol Installation Ganeshotsav at Idgah Maidan: High Court Rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's Plea Against Ganesh Idol Installation

Karnataka High Court rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's plea against Ganesh idol installation at Idgah Maidan in Hubballi. Get the latest updates on the legal battle and permissions for Ganesha festivities.

Woman living in adultery cannot claim maintenance: Karnataka High Court [Read Order] Woman living in adultery cannot claim maintenance: Karnataka High Court [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules that a woman engaged in adultery cannot claim maintenance, stating her dishonesty as a key factor.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-halts-directive-mandating-name-displays-for-hotel-owners-during-kanwar-yatra
Trending Judiciary
SC halts directive mandating name displays for hotel owners during Kanwar Yatra [Read Order]

The Supreme Court halts directives mandating name plates for hotel owners during Kanwar Yatra, citing concerns over exclusion and economic boycott.

22 July, 2024 02:53 PM
mp-high-court-calls-for-uniform-civil-code-says-it-needs-to-become-a-reality
Trending Judiciary
MP High Court calls for Uniform Civil Code, says “it needs to become a reality”

Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasizes the need for a Uniform Civil Code, highlighting its importance in combating superstitious practices and strengthening national integrity.

22 July, 2024 03:19 PM

TOP STORIES

state-govt-has-got-no-power-to-tinker-with-list-of-scheduled-castes-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
State govt has got no power to tinker with list of Scheduled Castes: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court ruled that state governments lack the authority to modify the Scheduled Castes lists, a power reserved exclusively for Parliament under Article 341.

17 July, 2024 09:31 AM
sc-asks-telangana-govt-to-replace-judge-in-commission-of-inquiry-into-power-pact-by-previous-govt
Trending Judiciary
SC asks Telangana govt to replace judge in Commission of Inquiry into power pact by previous govt

SC directs Telangana govt to replace Justice L Narasimha Reddy in Commission of Inquiry probing former CM KCR's alleged power sector irregularities.

17 July, 2024 09:40 AM
centre-notifies-appointments-justice-n-kotiswar-singh-justice-mahadevan-as-sc-judges
Trending Judiciary
Centre notifies appointments Justice N Kotiswar Singh, Justice Mahadevan as SC judges

Centre notifies appointments of Justice N Kotiswar Singh and Justice R Mahadevan as Supreme Court judges, marking the first SC judge from Manipur.

17 July, 2024 09:57 AM
imprisonment-till-rising-of-court-not-proper-sentence-for-serious-offence-of-bigamy-sc
Trending Judiciary
Imprisonment till rising of court not proper sentence for serious offence of bigamy: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court ruled that “imprisonment till the rising of the court" is not appropriate for bigamy, a serious offence, stressing the need for proportionate punishment.

17 July, 2024 10:00 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email