38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, May 23, 2024

Match Fixing Case: Delhi HC Allows Police To Interrogate Bookie Sanjeev Chawla In Tihar Jail Till Feb 28 [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      23 February, 2020 02:02 PM      0 Comments
Match Fixing Case Delhi HC Sanjeev Chawla

In a final judgement passed on 20th February, 2020, the Delhi High Court has ruled against the petitioner - Sanjeev Chawla, an alleged cricket bookie who was involved in one of the biggest match fixing scandals. The petitioner had challenged the magistrate's order dated February 13, 2020 wherein he had challenged his 12 days police custody in connection with the match fixing case. He argued that the police had already filed a charge sheet against him for offences under various sections of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - S. 420 - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property and 120B - Punishment of criminal conspiracy. It was further alleged that cognizance of the same was taken on 23rd June, 2013. Another point highlighted was that in the charge sheet there was no mention of further investigation and no leave till date has been sought from the Court for further investigation. 

The Delhi High Court has allowed the Delhi Police to interrogate Sanjeev Chawla in Tihar Jail. The Single judge bench of Justice Anu Malhotra has allowed the Delhi police to interrogate him only till February 28th. Post the interrogation his arrest period of 12 days will conclude. "Investigating agency in the matter is permitted to conduct the interrogation of the petitioner (Chawla) at the Tihar Jail complex only in the terms of the timeline stipulated in terms of Section 167(2) of the CrPC"

Further directions given by the court include his continuance in the jail till the trial concludes, in accordance with the assurances given by the Indian government to its counterpart in the United Kingdom. The court has further ordered the police to treat Chawla with dignity during the course of interrogation and investigation. Furthermore, the state has been directed to comply with the letter of assurances sent by the Ministry of Home Affairs to the UK government. 

The court highlighted : "The investigation agency may utilise the technology of video conference as submitted by the ASG for conducting the investigation and interrogation to the extent as prayed on the application of the state dated February 13th submitted before the trial court. As regards any follow up action required for the investigation and interrogation to the extent permitted herein above, the state may seek the permission of the trial court seized of the matter" 

Extradition proceedings had to be carried to ensure his presence in India. During the proceedings, British courts were informed by the Indian authorities that the investigation against him is complete and charge sheet has been filed as well. 

The petitioner had highlighted these letters too dated: 28th February, 2017 to 22nd September, 2017. In these letters, the Union Government had given assurances stating that the petitioner during the detention in pre and post trial conviction will be kept at Tihar Jail. 

Additional Solicitor General - Sanjay Jain who is appearing on behalf of the Delhi police informed the court that the Ministry of Home Affairs never gave an assurance to the UK Government. In light of a fair trial, Chawla has to be confronted with the evidence gathered against him to unveil the conspiracy and identify the others involved in the case. 

[Read Order]

Author - Dyuti Pandya 

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court dismisses plea for review of judgment on Article 370 [Read Order]

SC dismisses petitions challenging its ruling on Article 370, affirming the Centre's decision to revoke J&K's special status and create two Union Territories.

22 May, 2024 12:55 PM
Trending Judiciary
Manish Sisodia Bail: Court Cites "Great Betrayal of Democratic Principles" in Liquor Policy Case

Delhi HC rejects Manish Sisodia's bail plea in the liquor policy scam case, calling his conduct a "great betrayal of democratic principles" and a misuse of power.

22 May, 2024 01:11 PM


Trending Judiciary
ED to seek court nod for custody of accused, if not arrested till cognisance of complaint: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court ruled that the Enforcement Directorate must seek court approval for custody of an accused if not arrested before the court takes cognizance of a complaint.

17 May, 2024 01:38 PM
Trending Judiciary
Fundamental right to health includes consumers' right to be made aware of quality of products: SC [Read Order]

Right to health includes consumers' right to know product quality. Advertisers must submit self-declarations for ads to ensure transparency and accountability: SC

17 May, 2024 01:43 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC asks ED to file response to Soren's plea for interim on May 20

SC asks ED to file a response by May 20 to Hemant Soren's plea for interim bail during Lok Sabha elections, with a hearing scheduled for May 21.

17 May, 2024 06:12 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email