38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

MBBS Graduates Challenge Compulsory Rural Service: Karnataka High Court Issues Notice to Government

By Nancy Goyal      22 June, 2021 01:51 PM      0 Comments
MBBS Graduates Challenge Compulsory Rural Service: Karnataka High Court Issues Notice to Government

Recently,  a single bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum issued a notice to the State Government and concerned authorities in a batch of petitions challenging the Compulsory Rural Service.

The petitions have challenged the State Government's June 8 ,2021, notification which asked the 2021 MBBS graduates securing Government seats to register online for the Compulsory Rural Service under provisions of the Karnataka Compulsory Service to Candidates Completed Medical Courses Act 2012 (Compulsory Act).

A petition filed by Dr. Prathana N through advocates Manik B T of Thiru and Thiru Chambers stated that in the case of Bushree Anital Aleem the validity of the said law came to be upheld. Notwithstanding, it was declared that it will be applied prospectively and not retrospectively to students who got admission after 24.07.2015.

Further, in 2019 National Medical Commission Act was established and thus there is a paradigm shift that took place in medical education and the State Governments have lost their rights of regulating the admissions of medical colleges.

Further, it is stated that the notification dated June 6, 2021, stems out of the Compulsory Act which is a nonest law considering the NMC Act.

Another petition filed by Senior Advocate K G Raghvan stated that "Having regard to the content of the National Medical Commission Act the provisions of 2012 act (Karnataka Compulsory Service Training by Candidates Completed Medical Courses Act, 2012 and Rules of 2015) is repugnant to the 2019 Act. If the 2012 Act is inoperative then the notification dated June 8, also goes.

He also stated that Before the 2019 Act, medical education had become fragmented, each state was doing whatever it wanted. The medical council was afflicted by political interference. What suffered was medical education and infrastructure, it is to take care, this national law is made by the Parliament to ensure there is uniformity in all states."

Advocate N Ketty showing up for the NMC notified the court that there have been orders passed earlier by various benches of the high court in which the Act has been upheld, Similarly, certain categories of students who have completed their course till academic years 2017-18 have been released from doing the compulsory service on grounds that they were not notified about the compulsory service clause, by the colleges. He stated that he will place on record the previous orders for the perusal of the court and help the court on the same.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email