38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

By Jhanak Singh      05 March, 2020 02:03 PM      0 Comments
Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than one Percent

It was noted by the Supreme Court on February 28, 2020 that the expenditure incurred by the Governments on their respective states High Court, their subordinate departments or the district courts was less than 1% of their total expenditure for the tenure of 2018-19, except Delhi. This data was revealed by a Supreme Court order.

Delhi, the National Capital, spends Rs. 1,045 Crore for the judiciary institutions whereas their overall total expenditure in 2018-19 was Rs. 50,200 Crore. This comes to be about 2.08% of the total spending of Delhi on its judicial institutions. Notably, it is the highest among all other States or Union Territories.

Coming to other states, Uttar Pradesh spent Rs. 1,614 Crore which is the highest among states but this as well accounts for only 0.35 percent of the States total expenditure.

While talking about the same index, Arunachal Pradesh finds its place at the bottom of the table, having only Rs. 5.27 Crore being spent on Judiciary Institutions and even that comes around 0.02 percent of the states overall expenditure in 2018-19.

Assam comes at second from the bottom at the table by having only 0.09 percent of its total expenditure on Judiciary by spending a sum of Rs. 286 Crore with comparison to the states whole expenditure of Rs. 2.91 lakh crore.

Besides Delhi and Uttar Pradesh, there are only 6 states, namely Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, which spent more than 1,000 crore on institutions coming under the ambit of Judiciary in 2018-19.

This data was disclosed by the Supreme Court in its order of 28th February, 2020 by asking the states to implement the norms and recommendations made by Justice P Venkatarama Reddi Pay Commission which dealt with paying the allowances and finally the pension of the Judicial officers.

The pay commission under Justice P Venkatarama Reddi was set up by the Supreme Court in May 2017 on a petition filed by the All India Judges Association, which wanted to consider the conditions which are being faced by the Judicial Officers. The pay commission submitted its report to the court in January 2020.

The court saw that the primary objections raised over the years had primarily concerns about the scarcity of monetary assets. Such complaints, the court noted had been dismissed by the court on prior events as well.

The court then proceeded to note that the expenditure on judiciary was inadequate and negligible in comparison to overall spending by states.

the expenditure on account of High Court and subordinate courts in the respective states continues to be inadequate and negligible in comparison to its overall expenditure for the year 2018- 2019, the court said in its order.

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Senior counsel PS Narasimha was named amicus curiae to help the court. The court additionally directed that the states should be represented in this case by their respective advocate generals.

 

Author Devansh Dev



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

TRENDING NEWS

zero-fir-heres-all-you-need-to-know
Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
judicial-activist-ashwini-upadhyay-asks-sc-to-declare-amendment-to-preamble-as-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM

TOP STORIES

bombay-high-court-denies-interim-relief-in-plea-against-1-year-pan-masala-ban
Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-chief-justices-of-eight-high-courts
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
sc-orders-interim-bail-for-kejriwal-in-ed-case-refers-issues-on-arrest-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
hathras-incident-sc-refuses-to-consider-pil-on-inquiry-adequate-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email