38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Monitoring Committee to SC: Civic Bodies refused to carry out Sealing Drive

By LawStreet News Network      13 June, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments

A Monitoring committee, which was assigned by the court to identify and seal unauthorized constructions in Delhi, has claimed in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, June 12th, 2018 that civic bodies have refused to carry out sealing drive on the ground as the amendments in Master Plan of Delhi-2021 were not yet finalized.

Master Plan of Delhi-2021 is the blueprint of the urban planning and expansion of the metropolis which will ensure the overall development and the amendment which were proposed is to bring the uniform floor area ratio for shop-cum-residential plots and complexes.

Floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of a building's total floor area (gross floor area) to the size of the piece of land upon which it is built. The terms can also refer to limits imposed on such a ratio through zoning.

As a formula FAR = (gross floor area) / (area of the plot)

This matter was mentioned before a vacation bench of Justice U U Lalit and Justice Deepak Gupta where they said they would hear the issue on June 14th, 2018.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, who is assisting and offering information, expertise to the top court in the sealing matter, mentioned the issue before the bench and referred to the apex courts May 15 order which said that the monitoring committee would continue with its duties and responsibilities.

He has also submitted the report of monitoring committee which states that since the amendment in the Master Plan of Delhi-2021 were not finalized, they would not allow sealing to go on.

On June 8th, 2018 the monitoring committee have inspected some areas in South Delhi and asked authorities concerned of South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to take action against some unauthorized structures, but the authorities have refused to seal them.

As per the report the bench has asked to serve the copy of the report to the council appearing for the Delhi government, the Union of India and SDMC on June 14, 2018.

The monitoring committee, comprising Former advisor to the Election Commissioner, K J Rao; Chairman of Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority, Bhure Lal; and Major General (Retd) Som Jhingan, was set up on March 24, 2006, by the top court.

On May 24, 2018, Court had rejected the Centre's plea looking for modification for its order in which the Delhi development authority was asked to invite suggestions from the public on amending the Master Plan of Delhi-2021.

The top court had on May 15 accepted DDA's action plan in which it had listed out steps which includes the launching of an interactive internet site and a smartphone application to enable the public to register their grievances regarding illegal constructions and given the authority 15 days time to make it operational.

The DDA had also proposed to fix responsibility on officials in cases of illegal construction activities in the national capital and violation of the master plan and building bye-laws.

In its five-page motion plan, the DDA had formerly said that it intends to check all ongoing and future unauthorized constructions in the city under the supervision of a special task force which was constituted on April 25 following an apex court order.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email