38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rejects Plea Of 19-Year-Old Girl For Abortion Stating That She Is Mature Enough To Know The Consequences Of Unprotected Consensual Sex [READ ORDER]

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      13 September, 2021 03:26 PM      0 Comments
Madhya Pradesh High Court Rejects Plea Of 19-Year-Old Girl For Abortion Stating That She Is Mature Enough To Know The Consequences Of Unprotected Consensual Sex [READ ORDER]

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh rejected the application of a nineteen-year-old girl who had pleaded for an abortion in the court. The single bench Justice provided the reasoning for the same that the petitioner is mature enough to comprehend the outcome of having unprotected sex. 

CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONER 

The 19-year-old held that she was in a relationship with her partner for four or five years and he had made promises to her of marrying her and on that promise she had entered into a sexual relation with him. However, he eventually did not fulfil the promise and refused from marrying her due to which she is asking for the help from the court for aborting the child

LAW 

As per Sub-section 2 of section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 2021 a pregnancy, after 20 weeks can be legally aborted only if two doctors advise it or the woman is at a mental or physical health risk. It is also allowed in rape cases. 

OBSERVATION OF THE COURT

The Honble Judge Justice G.S. Ahluwalia on 27th August 2021 held that the reasons stated in the Act which were required for the girl to legally terminate the pregnancy are not present in this case and hence the petition for the termination was rejected. 

Furthermore, it was held by the Judge that the petitioner was an adult who was aware of the consequences of having consensual unprotected sex. 

Another reason given for not permitting the abortion was that the allegations of misrepresentation of fact do not show that the act was not consensual, which were made in the First Information Report.

It was also held that the FIR was filed only after the detection of the pregnancy. These reasons were held as a reason for rejecting the plea of the petitioner.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email