38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Muslim woman can seek maintenance from ex husband: Alld HC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      06 January, 2023 01:28 AM      0 Comments
Muslim woman can seek maintenance from ex husband: Alld HC [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a divorced Muslim woman can seek maintenance from her former husband for whole life, saying it is part of basic human rights to secure gender and social justice which is universally recognised by persons belonging to all religions.

A bench of Justices Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi explained that the correct position of law is that under Section 3(2) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (referred to as the Muslim Act, 1986), a divorcee can file an application before a Magistrate if her former husband has not paid to her a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance or mahr due to her or has not delivered the properties given to her before or at the time of her marriage by her relatives or friends or the husband or any of his relatives or friends.

"Under Section 3(3) of the Muslim Act, 1986, an order can be passed directing the former husband of the divorced woman to pay to her such reasonable and fair provision and maintenance as deemed fit and proper having regard to needs of the divorced woman, her standard of life enjoyed by her during her marriage and means of her former husband," the court said.

The court further explained that the word provision used in Section 3 of the Muslim Act, 1986 indicates that something is provided in advance for meeting some needs.

"In other words, at the time of divorce the Muslim husband is required to contemplate the future needs and make preparatory arrangements in advance for meeting those needs. Reasonable and fair provision may include provision for her residence, her food, her clothes, and other articles," the bench added.

The court cited the provisions of the Muslim Act, 1986 passed by Parliament following huge uproar over the Supreme Court's judgement in Shah Bano Begum case.

Referring to the Supreme Court's judgement in case of 'Danial Latifi and another Vs Union of India (2001), the High Court said the top court has fairly interpreted the provisions of Section 3 with regard to fair provision and maintenance and held that it would extend to the whole life of the divorced wife unless she gets married for a second time.

The High Court allowed an appeal filed a woman and set aside the order by the Family Court Ghazipur, saying it has committed a manifest error of law in its impugned judgement and order dated September 15, 2022 to hold that the applicant-appellant herein is entitled for maintenance only for the period of iddat, i.e. for three months and 13 days at the rate of Rs 1500 per month.

The High Court said the Muslim Act, 1986 is a piece of beneficial legislation enacted for welfare of such class of society who suffer great disparity and whose (her) investment in the marriage is the investment of her entire life which if breaks up and compensated in terms of money towards here livelihood, partakes the character of basic human rights to secure gender and social justice which is universally recognised by persons belonging to all religions and it is difficult to perceive that Muslim law intends to provide a different kind of responsibility and to deprive a divorced lady to any means of livelihood resulting in social injustice and leaving her life as curse.

Keeping in mind these great realities of a class of society, the provisions of the Muslim Act, 1986 has to be interpreted, the court added.

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email