38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Muslim woman can seek maintenance from ex husband: Alld HC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      06 January, 2023 01:28 AM      0 Comments
Muslim woman can seek maintenance from ex husband: Alld HC [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a divorced Muslim woman can seek maintenance from her former husband for whole life, saying it is part of basic human rights to secure gender and social justice which is universally recognised by persons belonging to all religions.

A bench of Justices Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi explained that the correct position of law is that under Section 3(2) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (referred to as the Muslim Act, 1986), a divorcee can file an application before a Magistrate if her former husband has not paid to her a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance or mahr due to her or has not delivered the properties given to her before or at the time of her marriage by her relatives or friends or the husband or any of his relatives or friends.

"Under Section 3(3) of the Muslim Act, 1986, an order can be passed directing the former husband of the divorced woman to pay to her such reasonable and fair provision and maintenance as deemed fit and proper having regard to needs of the divorced woman, her standard of life enjoyed by her during her marriage and means of her former husband," the court said.

The court further explained that the word provision used in Section 3 of the Muslim Act, 1986 indicates that something is provided in advance for meeting some needs.

"In other words, at the time of divorce the Muslim husband is required to contemplate the future needs and make preparatory arrangements in advance for meeting those needs. Reasonable and fair provision may include provision for her residence, her food, her clothes, and other articles," the bench added.

The court cited the provisions of the Muslim Act, 1986 passed by Parliament following huge uproar over the Supreme Court's judgement in Shah Bano Begum case.

Referring to the Supreme Court's judgement in case of 'Danial Latifi and another Vs Union of India (2001), the High Court said the top court has fairly interpreted the provisions of Section 3 with regard to fair provision and maintenance and held that it would extend to the whole life of the divorced wife unless she gets married for a second time.

The High Court allowed an appeal filed a woman and set aside the order by the Family Court Ghazipur, saying it has committed a manifest error of law in its impugned judgement and order dated September 15, 2022 to hold that the applicant-appellant herein is entitled for maintenance only for the period of iddat, i.e. for three months and 13 days at the rate of Rs 1500 per month.

The High Court said the Muslim Act, 1986 is a piece of beneficial legislation enacted for welfare of such class of society who suffer great disparity and whose (her) investment in the marriage is the investment of her entire life which if breaks up and compensated in terms of money towards here livelihood, partakes the character of basic human rights to secure gender and social justice which is universally recognised by persons belonging to all religions and it is difficult to perceive that Muslim law intends to provide a different kind of responsibility and to deprive a divorced lady to any means of livelihood resulting in social injustice and leaving her life as curse.

Keeping in mind these great realities of a class of society, the provisions of the Muslim Act, 1986 has to be interpreted, the court added.

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM

TOP STORIES

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM
sc-strikes-down-bihars-midway-change-in-recruitment-rules-for-assistant-engineers
Trending Judiciary
SC Strikes Down Bihar’s Midway Change in Recruitment Rules for Assistant Engineers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules recruitment criteria cannot be changed midway, strikes down Bihar’s retrospective amendment granting weightage to contractual engineers.

07 January, 2026 10:03 PM
only-light-and-not-any-fight-madras-hc-upholds-single-judges-order-allowing-lighting-of-lamps-on-deepathoon
Trending Judiciary
Only Light And Not Any Fight: Madras HC Upholds Single Judge’s Order Allowing Lighting Of Lamps On Deepathoon [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lighting of Karthigai Deepam at Deepathoon, rejecting public order objections and dismissing 20 appeals.

07 January, 2026 10:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email