38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

NCDRC issues non-bailable warrants against promoters of Greenopolis project of Gurugram

By Shreya Agarwal      17 November, 2023 11:35 AM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: Hearing a batch of applications seeking implementation of its orders the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has issued non-bailable warrants (NBWs) against directors of Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Group (Orris Group), in a case of failure to deliver homes to buyers in the Greenopolis project in Gurugram, where its Directors were co-promoters.   

The order has been passed for non-compliance of various decrees passed by the NCDRC in this regard, including execution decrees.

This is not the sole instance for Orris Group has failed to deliver projects, thus jeopardizing the homebuyers investments Aster Court Premium is another such project, also in Gurugram. Orris Group was directed to pay 30 individuals in this project.

The Commission reasoned that under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 the buyer can ask for refund from any co-promoter, and as Orris Group was a co-promoter, there is no reason to stay execution proceedings against it.

Since the decree has neither been complied with nor nobody (anybody) appears on behalf of the Managing Director or Director in the Court, issue non-bailable warrants to Vijay Gupta, Managing Director and Joginder Kumar, Director, it held.

Facts of the case

The brief facts of the case are that the applications were filed for executing the order of NCDRC in a complaint of July 2020 against 3 C Shelters Pvt Ltd and Orris Infrastructure Pvt Ltd upon which the Commission had passed an order in favour of the buyers, however, this order was not implemented by the developer companies.

Therefore, the buyers approached NCDRC seeking implementation of the orders through execution applications.

At the time that these applications were filed 3 C Shelters Pvt Ltd went into moratorium following an order of the National Company Law Tribunal. Then, although the companies sought abeyance of the execution order, the Consumer Forum refused the same stating that the promoters could still be proceeded against as personal guarantors.

On August 16, 2022, therefore the execution applications were disposed, directing the promoters to implement the decrees within 3 months.

The homebuyers then filed an application before NCDRC to revive their application, on which the companies informed NCDRC that its judgment has been stayed by the Supreme Court.

However, NCDRC once again sought compliance holding that as the companies had not filed appeals in the particular complaints of this case, but only against a common order, the execution would still have to be complied with. They were, thus, directed to either comply with the order or appear in person, both of which they flouted.

Hence, the Commission issued NBWs against the co-promoters - Vijay Gupta, Managing Director and Joginder Kumar, Director of Orris Group.

The homebuyers were represented by a team comprising Mr. Aditya Parolia, Ms. Sumbul Ismail & Ms. Ishita Singh.



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Order to appoint One Man Committee of Justice (Retd.) Lokur for the Prevention of Stubble Burning Kept in Abeyance by SC itself [READ ORDER] Order to appoint One Man Committee of Justice (Retd.) Lokur for the Prevention of Stubble Burning Kept in Abeyance by SC itself [READ ORDER]

CJI suggests holding measures in abeyance, questioning the PIL petitioner in the stubble burning case. Justice (Retd.) Madan B Lokur's role also discussed.

"Experts Say Your Beautiful Cars Also Contribute to Air Pollution," CJI SA Bobde Says While Hearing Stubble Burning Issue "Experts Say Your Beautiful Cars Also Contribute to Air Pollution," CJI SA Bobde Says While Hearing Stubble Burning Issue

Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde ensures no stubble burning orders will be passed without considering petitioners' input, confirms Senior Advocate Vikas Singh.

Centre states that Farmers Stubble Burning contributes to 10% Pollution; SC retailitates saying, 'Pollution is caused by city-related issues. Take care of them and then we will come to stubble burning' Centre states that Farmers Stubble Burning contributes to 10% Pollution; SC retailitates saying, 'Pollution is caused by city-related issues. Take care of them and then we will come to stubble burning'

Supreme Court urges Centre, Punjab, Haryana, and UP to implement work-from-home due to air pollution. Next hearing set for November 17, 2021.

WhatsApp Assures High Court Of Full Cooperation In Dhanbad Judge Murder Case WhatsApp Assures High Court Of Full Cooperation In Dhanbad Judge Murder Case

The CBI has charged auto-rickshaw driver Lakhan Verma and his brother Rahul with murder and false information, invoking IPC Sections 302, 201, and 34.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email