38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'No board exam for classes 5, 8, and 9 in Karnataka,' SC sets aside HC order

By Jhanak Sharma      12 March, 2024 07:37 PM      0 Comments
No board exam for classes 5 8 and 9 in Karnataka SC sets aside HC order

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday told the Karnataka government not to conduct board exams 5, 8, and 9, saying the state has already spoiled the education system and it should not complicate it further.

A bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal set aside an interim order of the Karnataka High Court's division bench order allowing the state government to conduct board exams for the summative assessment of students of classes 5, 8, and 9 as per the schedule, beginning from March 11.

We allow the present appeals and set aside the order passed by the division bench. The division bench to decide main appeals in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. The same be decided on merits, without being influenced by the observations made by us, the bench said.

A batch of pleas was filed by the Organization for Unaided Recognized Schools, RTE Students and Parents Association, and Registered Unaided Private Schools Management Association Karnataka challenging the order passed by the division bench of the high court.

Senior advocate Devadutt Kamat, appearing for the Karnataka government, insisted that the division bench passed a correct order.

Also Read -  Karnataka HC strikes down board exams for classes 5, 8, 9 and 11

He said it is not even an exam, it is a summative assessment, and it is the policy of the state to prepare students for their future.

Kamat said Class 9 and 11 are not covered by the Right to Education (RTE) Act and class 11 exams are already over.

Till Class 8 you are permitted to hold regular examinations (as per RTE), let the high court decide, twice the single bench of the high court did not allow (state government notification regarding examination), the bench pointed out.

Kamat referred to Section 30 of RTE, no child shall be required to pass a board examination till completion of elementary education.

"If they are not required to pass, why are you holding the examination," the bench asked him.

Kamat said, We found that in the classrooms what is being imparted may not be up to the standards. So as a state I need to know whether schools operating in our jurisdiction are doing their job or not and the best way to assess is to have a uniform assessment.

The bench then told Kamat, You have spoiled the entire education system of the country and now you want to complicate it. Please do not do that. No examination is required to be passed then do not hold the examination.

Kamat pressed that the examination is required. He asked the court to not allow the appeals against the division bench order.

"Board exams have their own scare. People are scared, the bench said.

Kamat asked the court to allow the exams for Class 9 students, as they have to prepare for Class 10, and Class 9 is not covered by RTE Act.

The bench said the government notifications were held to be illegal by the single bench of the high court.

Kamat said the single judge did not examine Section 22 or Section 15, and "an illegal order according to us has been passed, without noticing the provisions of the Act. This order cannot be sustained".

On March 7, a division bench comprising Justice K Somashekar and Justice Rajesh Rai K passed the interim order, staying the March 6 judgment of a single judge on an appeal filed by the state government questioning the correctness of the single judges order.

The single judge had quashed the states decision to hold board exams for classes 5, 8, 9, and 11 from the academic year 2023-24. The high court declared that said decision was taken without following the due process of law as prescribed under the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983. 
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM

TOP STORIES

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM
injunction-suit-without-declaration-of-title-not-maintainable-when-possession-lies-with-defendant-sc
Trending Judiciary
Injunction Suit Without Declaration Of Title Not Maintainable When Possession Lies With Defendant: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an injunction suit without a declaration of title is not maintainable when possession rests with the defendant.

06 November, 2025 03:25 PM
when-multiple-documents-on-same-property-are-challenged-court-fee-payable-only-on-principal-relief-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
When Multiple Documents On Same Property Are Challenged, Court Fee Payable Only On Principal Relief: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that when multiple documents on the same property are challenged, court fee is payable only on the principal relief.

06 November, 2025 03:40 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email