38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No disciplinary proceedings allowed against employee after retirement: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      20 November, 2024 03:47 PM      0 Comments
No disciplinary proceedings allowed against employee after retirement SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said that an employee can't be subjected to disciplinary proceeding, if he has retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation or after the extended period of service.

SC Rules: Disciplinary Actions Invalid Post Superannuation or Extended Service

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan also said a departmental proceeding is not initiated merely on issuance of a show cause notice, but it is initiated only when a chargesheet is issued because that is the date of application of mind on the allegations levelled against an employee by the competent authority.

With this observations, the court dismissed a plea by State Bank of India against a judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which quashed an order of termination issued against Navin Kumar Sinha.

In the case, the High Court held that the disciplinary proceeding was initiated after his superannuation, including the extended period of service. It was alleged the employee sanctioned loans in favour of his relatives in deviation of banking norms.

SBI Directed to Expedite Release of Retired Employee’s Pending Dues

The bench also noted the respondent employee had actually superannuated from service in SBI on December 26, 2003 on completion of 30 years of service but his service was extended prior thereto on August 05, 2003 from December 27, 2003 to October 01, 2010. But after October 01, 2010 there was no further extension of service.

While upholding the HC's order, the bench said disciplinary proceeding against the respondent was not initiated on August 18, 2009 when the first notice to show cause was issued but was initiated only on March 18, 2011 when the disciplinary authority issued the charge memo to him.

The SBI's counsel claimed it was the case of the employee himself before the enquiry officer, disciplinary authority as well as before the appellate authority that he was due to superannuate on October 30, 2012. He also did not plead either before the said authorities or before the High Court that he had ceased to be in service of SBI from October 01, 2010 and therefore the disciplinary proceeding initiated thereafter on March 18, 2011 was void-ab-initio. As such, it said, the High Court was not justified in accepting the challenge to the order of penalty on a completely different ground.

"We are afraid we cannot accept such a contention on behalf of the appellants. Where the disciplinary proceeding itself is without jurisdiction, upholding the same on the specious plea that it was not challenged on the ground of lack of jurisdiction would be tantamount to giving imprimatur to a patently illegal proceeding," the bench said.

Referring to the rules, the bench said, subsisting disciplinary proceeding i.e. one initiated before superannuation of the delinquent officer may be continued post superannuation by creating a legal fiction of continuance of service of the delinquent officer for the purpose of conclusion of the disciplinary proceeding (in this case as per Rule 19(3) of the Service Rules).

"But no disciplinary proceeding can be initiated after the delinquent employee or officer retires from service on attaining the age of superannuation or after the extended period of service," the bench said.

After dismissing the appeal, the court directed the SBI to release all the service dues of the employee expeditiously and not later than six weeks.
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM

TOP STORIES

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM
hp-may-vanish-in-thin-air-god-forbid-sc-on-ecological-imbalance-in-himachal-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
‘HP may vanish in thin air, God forbid', SC on ecological imbalance in Himachal Pradesh [Read Order]

SC warns HP may vanish due to ecological imbalance; seeks state’s action plan amid rising disasters, deforestation, and climate change threats.

04 August, 2025 11:31 AM
sc-grants-4-weeks-time-to-centre-to-frame-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC grants 4 weeks time to Centre to frame guidelines to ensure pedestrians right to use footpath

SC gives Centre 4 weeks to frame guidelines ensuring pedestrians’ right to obstruction-free, accessible footpaths under Article 21.

04 August, 2025 11:41 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email