38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No ground for stay on validly enacted Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, Centre tells SC

By Jhanak Sharma      23 May, 2025 12:49 PM      0 Comments
No ground for stay on validly enacted Waqf Amendment Act 2025 Centre tells SC

NEW DELHI: Upon hearing intensive arguments for three days, the Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order on the issue of interim relief in a batch of pleas challenging the constitutional validity of Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

Strongly defending the provisions of the enactment, the Centre contended mere legal propositions or hypothetical arguments were insufficient to stay the operation of the law duly enacted by Parliament.

A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih concluded hearing arguments on interim orders.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on behalf of the Centre submitted that there was no ground for staying a “validly enacted statute” by the competent legislature.

“The very fact that the court has to hear the batch of pleas for interim stay for three days, shows there is nothing ex-facie unconstitutional with the law. Mere legal arguments are insufficient to stay the statute. There is no ground for staying a validly enacted statute by the competent legislature," Mehta submitted.

He contended that creating a Waqf is different than donating to a Waqf, this is why five years practice requirement for Muslims so that Waqf is not used for defrauding someone.

"Suppose I am a Hindu and I want to donate for Waqf, then donation can be made to a Waqf. How can a non-Muslim be allowed to create a Waqf? He can always donate to a Waqf," Mehta said.

He asserted that pleas were filed without any proper materials to support.

Mere legal propositions or hypothetical arguments do not justify halting the operation of a law duly enacted by the Parliament, he maintained.

Mehta also claimed that Waqf management had misused monuments, giving rooms for shops and making unauthorised alterations.

He also submitted that the dedication of land as waqf is permanent and irreversible. Therefore, land belonging to members of Scheduled Tribes cannot be dedicated as Waqf, he said.

"The state restricts the alienation of tribal land to protect tribal communities. Otherwise, anyone could become a mutawalli (Manager of waqf property) and misuse the waqf to their detriment," he said.

Mehta further argued that Muslim tribals are being victimised.

“There may be differing points of view, but that cannot be a ground to stay the operation of a duly enacted law,” he said.

Petitioners led by senior advocate Kapil Sibal opposed the submission, contending, “For that, there are other laws. You cannot take my right over the waqf property because of these issues."

Sibal also asked if Waqfs used for religious purposes can be stripped of the status merely for being unregistered.

"Can the government for its own fault of not conducting surveys now claim Waqf properties as government land by a legislative fiat," Sibal asked.

Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the State of Rajasthan, supported the 2025 Act. He said that ‘waqf by user’ is not a core practice of Islam, as it did not involve any formal dedication. It was merely a way of holding land as waqf through adverse possession.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar appearing for Haryana government and a tribal organisation supporting the 2025 Amendments, said in Rajasthan, a Waqf claim was made over a 500-acre land given for mining purposes.

In previous hearings, the Centre gave an assurance that no waqf properties, including those established by user, would be denotified. It said that no appointments to the Central Waqf Council or State Waqf Boards would be made under the 2025 Act, till the next date of hearing.

On April 25, the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs filed a preliminary affidavit defending the amended Waqf Act of 2025. The Centre had opposed any blanket stay by the court on a law having a presumption of constitutionality passed by Parliament.

The Supreme Court had said only five petitions will be treated as lead petition in the matter. The apex court said the other writ petitions will be treated as intervention applications. Over 100 petitions have been filed against the 2025 Act.

On May 21, the Union government told the court that Waqf is an Islamic concept, but it is not an essential part of Islam. Mehta said that waqf is nothing but just charity in Islam.

He said that charity is recognised in every religion, and it cannot be regarded as an essential tenet of any religion.

On May 21, the Supreme Court said that there was a presumption of constitutional validity in favour of every statute passed by Parliament and those challenging validity of Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 must make out a very strong and glaring case.

The Centre notified the Waqf Act, 2025 after it got President Droupadi Murmu's assent on April 5.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email