38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No reason to seal Delhi shops on the ground of unauthorised conversion if they were originally sold as shops: SC

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      05 February, 2021 03:36 PM      0 Comments
No reason to seal Delhi shops on the ground of unauthorised conversion if they were originally sold as shops: SC

In a possible relief to the commercial shop owners of Delhi market areas whose establishments were sealed by the Municipal Corporation for the unauthorised conversion of residential properties to commercial establishments, the Supreme Court on 3/2/2021 observed that such establishments which were originally sold as shops must be de-sealed as it affects the livelihoods of affected individuals.

 

These premises were sealed by the Supreme Court-appointed monitoring committee for unauthorised use. Unauthorised use of the property happens when the property which was originally purchased as residential units are unauthorizedly converted to commercial use.

The observation by the court came while considering an Interlocutory Application filed on behalf of Defence Colony Market Welfare Association. The counsel for the applicant-association informed the court that there are many shops which have been purchased by the owners for commercial use, but these have been sealed by the Monitoring Committee on the ground that there is an unauthorised and illegal diversion of the user of the shops.

The counsel for the applicant was able to present before the court the Certificate of Sale that showed that the premises were original purchased as a shop. The notice for the auction held on 20.11.1957 which shows that 14 shops in Defence Colony were meant to be auctioned as shops were also presented.

Based on the documents presented the court observed that:

If it is a fact that the premises which have been sealed on the ground of unauthorised change of user from residential to commercial, was sold as a shop, we see no reason why the sealing should continue.

However, the court also sounded caution by saying that it is important to determine which of the sealed premises were originally purchased as shops. The court further directed that a definitive list of such mistakenly sealed property be made at the earliest. Further, the court tasked A.D.N. Rao as Amicus Curiae to verify all the relevant documents regarding the original purchase of the premises.

Permission was also sought and granted to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to point out the original documents which are to be verified to determine the original status of the premises.

In consideration of the issue of livelihoods involved in the matter court directed the Amicus Curiae submit his report to this Court within four weeks. The interlocutory application and others in the case will be considered by the court after four weeks upon receiving the report from the Amicus Curiae.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email